Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1972 12(3):525-537; doi:10.1093/icb/12.3.525
© 1972 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JAHAN-PARWAR, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral and Electrophysiological Studies on Chemoreception in Aplysia

BEHRUS JAHAN-PARWAR
Department of Biology, Clark University Worcester Massachusetts 01610

Using the typical mouth opening response (MOR) as the index of chemore-ception, several amino acid constituents of natural food for Aplysia were effective in eliciting MOR in concentrations as low is 10–6 10–7 M (glutamic acid) and 10–5 10–6 M (aspartic acid). It was suggested that these substances may serve as food attractants for this animal. Combined results of behavioral and electrophysiological experiments indicated that the most sensitive food receptors of Aplysia are predominantly located in the anterior tentacular groove area of the oral veil. These receptors appeared to strongly project to the caudal dark cell clusters of the cerebral ganglion. Extracellular recording of single afferent units following oral veil stimulation with various chemicals showed that the chemoreceptors in the anterior tentacular groove area were 100 to 1000 times more sensitive to food substances than other stimuli tested. It was suggested that these receptors are relatively "specific" to food attractants. There was a correlation between behavioral and electrophysiological threshold data for the individual compounds. The electrophysiological thresholds however were 5–15 times higher than the behavioral thresholds.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.