Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1973 13(2):337-355; doi:10.1093/icb/13.2.337
© 1973 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANG, F.
Right arrow Articles by ATWOOD, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Crustacean Neuromuscular Mechanisms: Functional Morphology of Nerve Terminals and the Mechanism of Facilitation

FRED LANG and HAROLD L. ATWOOD
Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Two aspects of crustacean neuromuscular physiology are discussed: (1) the ultrastructural identification of the excitatory and inhibitory nerve terminals, and (2) the characteristics of, and the possible mechanisms for, facilitation.

The first problem was studied in crayfish opener muscle which has one excitatory and one inhibitory axon. One of the nerves was stimulated in the presence of DNP until synaptic transmission failed; the preparations were then fixed for electron microscopy. Whenever the excitatory nerve was stimulated, the terminals with round synaptic vesicles were depleted while nearby terminals with smaller elongate vesicles were normal. When the inhibitory nerve was stimulated, the converse was true.

The possible reasons for the diversity in crustacean neuromuscular properties are discussed. Large EPSP's with a high quantal content (m), appear to be produced by terminals which are invaded by a propagated spike. Small EPSP's (small m) appear to be produced by terminals which don't spike and which are depolarized by a decrementally conducted potential. There is an inverse relationship between m and the amount of facilitation. The physiological basis for facilitation is discussed; previous hypotheses are found wanting and a new one is proposed, that of slow depolarization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.