Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1973 13(2):409-425; doi:10.1093/icb/13.2.409
© 1973 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIS, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by BRITTON DAVIS, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ontogeny of a Simple Locomotor System: Role of the Periphery in the Development of Central Nervous Circuitry

WILLIAM J. DAVIS and KATHRYN BRITTON DAVIS
The Thimann Laboratories, University of California Santa Cruz, California 95064

The development of locomotor systems in the lobster Homarus americanus is described. The tail—flip escape response is fully developed when the larvae hatch, and occurs without the participation of giant fibers. The abdominal swimmerets are undifferentiated at hatching, but are fully developed two to three weeks later when the animals molt to the fourth larval stage. Forward locomotion in the pelagic larvae is achieved using thoracic swimming appendages until the fourth larval stage, when these degenerate and the swimmerets assume the locomotor role.

The hypothesis that peripheral structures specify the central nervous connections of motoneurons during ontogeny was tested in the swimmeret system. Presumptive swimmeret appendages, including prospective muscle and sense organs, were extirpated prior to their differentiation in newly hatched larvae. The corresponding swimmeret motoneurons nevertheless grew and formed normal central connections, as evidenced by the appearance of normal patterns of rhythmic locomotor discharge and normal reflexes at the usual time. Moreover, swimmeret motoneurons retained normal patterns of motor output even when the regeneration of their target appendages was prevented for as long as two months. Therefore, the formation of normal motor output patterns during ontogeny is not dependent upon feedback from differentiated target muscle nor from sense organs which normally monitor the results of the motor activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.