Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1975 15(4):881-903; doi:10.1093/icb/15.4.881
© 1975 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NICOLL, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radioimmunoassay and Radioreceptor Assays for Prolactin and Growth Hormone: A Critical Appraisal

CHARLES S. NICOLL
Department of Physiology-Anatomy, University of California Berkeley, California 94720

The promise and the problems associated with using radioimmunoassays (RIA's) for mammalian prolactins (PRL's) and growth hormones (GH's) for the measurements of these hormones in the blood of foreign species (mammalian and nonmammalian) are considered. When crossreactivity is found with the plasma of a foreign species in heterologously applied RIA's for these hormones of mammalian origin, one can have little confidence about the nature of the crossreacting material that is being measured. Extensive analysis is necessary to establish that a particular RIA system measures the PRL or GH in a foreign species.

The question of whether RIA's for PRL and GH give physiologically meaningful measurements of the blood levels of these hormones is considered. In the case of PRL, analysis of our own results and data in the literature raises serious questions about the physiological validity of existing RIA's for mammalian PRL's. Evaluation of the available information on RIA's for mammalian GH discloses that there is no basis for concluding that any of them give measurements of the circulating levels of the hormone that are physiologically meaningful. It is also apparent that the physiological significance of the radioreceptor assays for PRL and GH remains to be established.

From analysis of discrepancies between bioassay and RIA estimates of PRL and GH levels in adenohypophysial tissue, incubation medium, and plasma or serum, and of studies on the metabolism of purified and secreted forms of both hormones, it is suggested that the major intraglandular forms of PRL and GH are in fact prohormones.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.