Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1977 17(1):93-105; doi:10.1093/icb/17.1.93
© 1977 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Microarchitecture of Body Wall of Extant Cyclostome Ectoprocts

JUNE R. P. Ross
Department of Biology, Western Washington State College College, Bellingham, Washington,98225

Scanning electron microscope and light microscope studies of the body wall in cyclostome stenolaemate ectoprocts show that this wall has a distinctive microarchitecture. The microstructures consist of a linear series of longitudinal canals in the central region. Adjoining regions on either side have laminae of overlapping calcareous tablets. In some cyclostomes at certain stages of growth, laminae may show a less orderly meshwork pattern near the canals. The laminate layers of calcareous tablets are enclosed in an organic matrix and are penetrated by tubuli which pass from the inner part of the body wall to the canals and also link the canals. The canals with organic and mineralized matrices open into pores in the body wall. This elaborate meshwork and canal and pore system provide the framework for growth and resorption of the body wall and facilitate transport of cellular materials from one zooid to another in a colony. Calcification at the distal part of a colony seems to proceed in a series of stages around sites of calcification. The pattern of the body wall of the cyclostome ectoproct does not parallel a molluscan pattern of skeletal growth as previously proposed. The hypothesis of a hypostegal coelom in some cyclostome ectoprocts is rejected.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.