Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1979 19(4):1085-1096; doi:10.1093/icb/19.4.1085
© 1979 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KRAEMER, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Corbicula (Bivalvia: Sphaeriacea) vs. Indigenous Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionacea) in U.S. Rivers: A Hard Case for Interspecific Competition?

LOUISE RUSSERT KRAEMER
Department of Zoology, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

At a time when populations of indigenous river mussels have been dwindling and/or disappearing, the introduced Asian clam, Corbicula, has spread through many U.S. rivers from California to Florida. In the Arkansas River Navigation System, a heavily managed waterway, Corbicula presently has a different "competitive" presence than it does in the relatively unmanaged Buffalo River in Arkansas. Comparative studies of both Corbicula and indigenous bivalved mollusks reveal biological bases for the contrasting kinds of benthic faunal change. There are ecologically relevant, distinctive differences between the two kinds of animals: in mantle/shell and mantle/gill apparatus, in the reproductive complex and neuroanatomy, and in spawning and locomotor behaviors. It is argued that the conservative molluscan characteristics of Corbicula enable it to function in an exclusive, "contradictory" role with indigenous bivalves in a heavily managed waterway, and in a "contrary" competitive role elsewhere. Rationale is presented for incorporating organismic evaluation into studies of competition between distantly related taxa.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.