Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1981 21(1):153-164; doi:10.1093/icb/21.1.153
© 1981 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldfoot, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Olfaction, Sexual Behavior, and the Pheromone Hypothesis in Rhesus Monkeys: A Critique1

DAVID A. Goldfoot
Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center Madison, Wisconsin 53706

SYNOPSIS. Evidence in support of and contrary to the hypothesis that rhesus monkeys possess a sexual pheromonal system is presented and discussed. New evidence demonstrates that solicitations of females given estradiol are more attractive to males in part because the females allow males to mount much more frequently only when the females have initiated the sexual interaction. In addition, evidence is presented which demonstrates that an odorous control substance stimulates sexual activity just as well as the purported "active component" of vaginal secretions under restricted conditions of evaluation. Finally, preliminary evidence suggests the possibility that odorous products from the vagina, unrelated to short-chain aliphatic acids, present qualitatively distinct cues to the male during the periovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. However, only sexually experienced males, and not young adult "virginal" males nor adult isosexually-reared males, selectively attended to midcycle vaginal products when these were placed on environmental surfaces. It is concluded that male rhesus monkeys may utilize odorous cues from the female during sexual interactions, but these cues are neither necessary nor sufficient for the coordination of fertile matings. Furthermore, olfactory communication in this species does not fit the accepted definition of pheromone: the odors are not specific for one species; the behavior elicited is not specific to sexual arousal; and volatile materials other than vaginal products can stimulate sexual activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.