Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1981 21(1):197-209; doi:10.1093/icb/21.1.197
© 1981 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COX, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Agonistic Encounters Among Male Elephant Seals: Frequency, Context, and the Role of Female Preference1

CATHLEEN R. COX2
Department of Psychology, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305

SYNOPSIS. Aggressive interactions between male northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris, observed during the course of three breeding seasons are analyzed from the perspective of costs and benefits to individuals. Males spend less than one percent of their time in aggressive activities and the overwhelming majority of agonistic interactions consist only of visual and vocal threats rather than physical combat. Males are most likely to threaten other males when the likelihood that they will be successful in displacing the opponent is high. Males who are mounting females, or who are in close proximity to females, are threatened more frequently than males who are otherwise occupied. However, high ranking bulls do regularly issue threats which are not provoked by the location or behavior of the recipient. Despite the obvious costs of such threats, this behavior may be favored as a result of female choice. Estrous females are more receptive when mounted by a male who has just dominated another than when mounted by a male of similar rank who has been resting or recently displaced by a stillmore dominant male.

A general argument is made that in species where social status of males is correlated with their genetic fitness, female choice is likely to be based on social signals which are used incompetition between males.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.