Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1981 21(4):853-864; doi:10.1093/icb/21.4.853
© 1981 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOX, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Defense and Dynamics in Plant-Herbivore Systems1

LAUREL R. FOX
Biology Board of Studies, University of California Santa Cruz, California 95064

Recent theory about interactions between plants and their herbivores focuses on properties of individual plants that affect their resistance to herbivores, and it extrapolates from these individual properties to those of whole communities. In this paper I question three major assumptions of this approach—costs of defenses, basic differences between classes of defenses, and step-wise coevolution—and recast the theory from a different community perspective. I propose that major differences in defenses between plants with very different life-history characteristics arise from differences in community structure, especially the numbers of herbivore species involved in the interactions. In particular, because of the diffuse pattern of herbivory on persistent plants, a new model of coevolution—diffuse coevolution—becomes appropriate when many species are involved. Complex interacting assemblages have special properties that cannot be derived just by summing up all of the simple interactions that occur.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.