Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1982 22(1):17-26; doi:10.1093/icb/22.1.17
© 1982 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MACWILLIAMS, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Pattern Formation in Hydra Head Regeneration1

HARRY K. MACWILLIAMS
Department of Anatomy, University of Massachusetts Medical Center Worcester, Massachusetts 01605

SYNOPSIS. I have reinvestigated the "classical" Hydra transplantation phenomena, using experiments of simple design and large sample sizes. All experiments involved transplanting small tissue fragments from a donor hydra to a host.

Both of the effects which are considered to demonstrate "head inhibition" in hydra (removing the head of the host, and placing transplants at different distances from the host's head) can be explained by assuming a diffusible inhibitory substance produced in the head; the apparent half-life of the substance is 2 hr and the apparent diffusion constant 2 x 10–6cm2/sec.

In contrast, the two effects which are considered to demonstrate the "head activation" probably have different mechanisms. The "head activation gradient" is controlled by a factor with a half-life of 36 hr or more; the "activation increase" of head regeneration has an apparent half-life of about 12 hr.

Further new findings are (i) that the head inhibition is restored quite late in head regeneration, (ii) that some head inhibitor appears to be produced in hydra's body, and (iii) that injury produces a local increase in the head activation.

All these results can be rationalized by a new version of the Gierer-Meinhardt model; this model also accounts quantitatively for the changes in transplantation properties during head regeneration and for the proportioning of hydra's body and head. In simulations the model has 9 independent parameters but predicts 17 seemingly independent results. The model is thus more than trivially successful, and seems suitable as a guiding hypothesis for further work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.