Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1982 22(2):311-328; doi:10.1093/icb/22.2.311
© 1982 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POPPER, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by COOMBS, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Morphology and Evolution of the Ear in Actinopterygian Fishes1

ARTHUR N. POPPER and SHERYL COOMBS2
Department of Anatomy, Georgetown University Schools of Medicine and Dentistry Washington, D.C. 20007
Department of Anatomy, Georgetown University Schools of Medicine and Dentistry Washington, D.C. 20007 and and Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

SYNOPSIS. In this paper we consider various aspects of the anatomy and ultrastructure of the actinopterygian ear and make a number of suggestions on the possible adaptive significance of the structural specializations. The focus of the arguments is based upon the substantial inter-specific variation in teleost auditory systems as measured anatomically, behaviorally, and physiologically. It is potentially of considerable significance that the major points of inter-specific variation in the teleost ear are associated with the gross morphology and ultrastructure of the otolithic organ most often implicated in sound detection, the sacculus. Analysis of patterns of sacculus ultrastructure has led to the conclusion that there are, in effect, only about five different saccular ultrastructural patterns but that these patterns are broadly found throughout the teleost fishes. Based upon patterns of inter-specific variation in the sacculus and in other aspects of the ear and more peripheral auditory structures (e.g., swimbladder), it is argued that adaptations encountered in the teleost auditory system cannot be used as reliable taxonomic indicators among fishes. Rather, it is proposed that the teleost auditory system is quite maleable in the evolutionary sense, and that interspecific similarities in many features of the auditory system reflect convergent evoluuon, rather than phylogenetic affinities. The actual selective pressures operating in the evoluuon of the fish auditory system are still essentially unknown. In addition, we cannot be certain that similar ear patterns in different species reflect convergent evolution (or common ancestry), or that conversely, different ear patterns among species reflect differences in auditory function.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.