Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1982 22(2):329-342; doi:10.1093/icb/22.2.329
© 1982 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEBB, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Locomotor Patterns in the Evolution of Actinopterygian Fishes1

PAUL W. WEBB
The University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 and and National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Center Lajolla, California 92038

SYNOPSIS. Locomotor adaptations in actinopterygian fishes are described for (a) caudal propulsion, used in cruising and sprint swimming, acceleration, and fast turns and (b) median and paired fin propulsion used for slow swimming and in precise maneuver. Caudal swimming is subdivided into steady (time independent) and unsteady (time dependent acceleration and turning) locomotion.

High power caudal propulsion is the major theme in actinopterygian swimming morphology because of its role in predator evasion and food capture. Non-caudal slow swimming appears to be secondary and is not exploited before the Acanthopterygii.

Optimal morphological requirements for unsteady swimming are (a) large caudal fin and general body area, (b) deep caudal peduncle, often enhanced by posterior dorsal and anal fins, (c) an anterior stabilizing body mass and\or added mass, (d) flexible body and (e) large ratio of muscle mass to body mass. Optimal morphological requirements for steady swimming are (a) high aspect ratio caudal fin, (b) narrow caudal peduncle, (c) small total caudal area, (d) anterior stabilizing body mass and added mass, and (e) a stiff body. Small changes in morphology can have large effects on performance.

Exclusive morphological requirements for steady versus unsteady swimming are partially overcome using collapsible fins, but compromises remain necessary. Morphologies favoring unsteady performance are a recurring theme in actinopterygian evolution. Successive radiations at chondrostean, halecostome and teleostean levels are associated with modifications in the axial and caudal skeleton.

Strength of ossified structures probably limited maximum propulsion forces early in actinopterygian evolution, so that specializations for fast cruising (carangiform and thunmform modes) followed structural advances especially in the caudal skeleton. No such limits apply to eel-like forms which consequently recur in successive actinopterygian radiations.

Slow swimming using mainly non-caudal propulsion probably first occurred among neopterygians in association with reduced and neutral buoyancy. Slow swimming adaptations can add to and extend the scope of caudal swimming, but specialization is associated with reduced caudal swimming performance. Marked exploitation of slow swimming opportunities does not occur prior to the anterodorsal location of pectoral and pelvic girdles and the vertical rotation of the base of the pectoral fin, as found in the Acanthopterygii.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.