Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1982 22(3):723-733; doi:10.1093/icb/22.3.723
© 1982 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SIEBERS, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bacterial—Invertebrate Interactions in Uptake of Dissolved Organic Matter1

DIETRICH SIEBERS
Biologische Anslalt Helgoland (Zentrale) Notkestraße 31, D-2000 Hamburg-52, Federal Republic of Germany

SYNOPSIS. AS compared to integumentary uptake systems of soft-bodied marine invertebrates, bacterial systems, in terms of transport constants, are much better adapted to the low concentrations of dissolved organic nutrients encountered in coastal and offshore waters. Bacteria respond to the presence of suitable dissolved organic substrates with induction, uptake and multiplication, maintaining the concentrations of dissolved organic matter (DOM) permanently low. At realistic in situ concentrations, epidermal uptake by pelagic and epibenthic animals proceeds at such low rates that scarcely a substantial proportion of their metabolic needs is provided by absorption. In marine sediments, where the life processes of bacteria and animals are closely interrelated, the macrofauna is sheltered by shells, firm tubes and burrows, which are irrigated by means of overlying water of the water column. Hence, interstitial water with its sometimes higher concentrations of DOM is scarcely available to sediment-dwelling larger metazoans. The meiofauna mainly inhabits the few millimeters of the upper sediment layers and the thin halos surrounding irrigated macrofaunal burrows, where sufficient oxygen is available. Unless the magnitude of horizontal water movement, the amounts of diffusional nutrient supply and the percentages, by which nutrient concentrations are reduced by meiofaunal uptake, are known, estimations of nutritional benefits from uptake of DOM by meiofauna cannot be made. For all infaunal taxa, bacteria appear to represent a major food supply.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.