Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1984 24(1):13-22; doi:10.1093/icb/24.1.13
© 1984 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FUNG, Y. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Structure and Stress-Strain Relationship of Soft Tissues1

Y. C. FUNG
Department of AMES/Bioengineenng, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

The mechanical properties of a soft tissue are related to its structure. Weshall illustrate this by the properties of the arteries and the lung. Viscoelasticity, strain rate effects, pseudo-elasticity, and constitutive equations ar discussed. The mecahnical properties of an organ is, however, not only based onthe tissues of the organ, but also on its geometry and relationship to the neighboring organs. A typical example is the blood vessel. The capillary blood vessels of the mesentery are "rigid"; those in the bat's wing are "distensible"; whereas the capillaries of the lung are "sheet" like: rigid in one plane, and compliant in another. The stress-strain relationship of the systemic arteries is highly nonlinear, stiffening exponentially with increasing strains; yet that of the pulmonary arteries in the lung is linear. The systemic veins are easily collapsible; yet the pulmonary veins in the lung are not: they remain patent when the blood pressure falls below the alveolargas pressure. The explanation of these differences lies in the varied interactions between the blood vessels and the surrounding tissues in different organs. The implications of these differences on blood circulation are pointed out. Therole of ultrastructure is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.