Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1984 24(1):45-55; doi:10.1093/icb/24.1.45
© 1984 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JUMARS, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by NOWELL, A. R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Fluid and Sediment Dynamic Effects on Marine Benthic Community Structure1

PETER A. JUMARS and ARTHUR R. M. NOWELL
School of Oceanography, WB-10, College of Ocean and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195

Fluid and sediment dynamics affect benthic community dynamics and structure in manifold ways. We single out three community-structuring processes that are both strongly affected and amenable to controlled manipulation: microbial population growth, faunal recruitment, and particle feeding. Attachment and colony growth rates of microbes depend on the details of near-bed fluid exchange. Their emigration and colony growth rates are affected by erosion of microbial filmsand by abrasion during sediment transport.

Recruitment and successional patterns of metazoans, especially those resulting from the settlement of weakly swimming, small larvae and juveniles, also are very sensitive to local variations in boundary layer flow pattern and strength. While the importance of particle fluxes to suspension feeders has long been apparent, the foraging patterns of a growing number of surface deposit feeders are being found to reflect a dependence upon sediment transport. Although these three processes have spatial and temporal scales amenable to both laboratory and field experimentation, proper dynamic scaling of laboratory model flows may not always be easy. Even the simplest two-phase (particles plus liquids, where particles can be bacteria, floes, larvae, or sediments) flows must match appropriate laboratory and field Reynolds number, Froude number, particle-fluid density (weight per unit volume) ratio, and the ratio of boundary layer thickness to particle size, if the laboratory flow model is to provide accurate results.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.