Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1984 24(2):397-406; doi:10.1093/icb/24.2.397
© 1984 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOWARD, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alternative Mating Behaviors of Young Male Bullfrogs1

RICHARD D. HOWARD
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Yearling male bullfrogs often attempt to intercept and mate with females attracted to older, larger males (male parasitism) instead of defending a territory and attracting their own mates. Mating behaviors like male parasitism are thought to occur only when individuals suffer some strong disadvantage in using the behaviors that are more typical of their species. In this paper, I consider the relative benefits and costs of territoriality vs male parasitism for yearling males. Yearlings employing male parasitism are only occasionally successful at mating, and in years of reduced male-male competition, they produce significantly fewer young than territorial males of their age. Yearling males that vary in the degree to which they employ territorial behaviors instead of male parasitism do not differ measurably in growth rate or chances of mortality; however, indirect information suggests that territoriality should entail a greater chance of mortality. A computer simulation based solely on observed demographic parameters predicts that yearling males should be territorial whenever they can compete as effectively as two-year-old males. This condition appears to provide little restriction on the breeding tactics of yearling males; however, data on male-male aggressive encounters show that the size differences between one-year-old and two-year-old males are usually sufficient to preclude yearling males from competing successfully. Thus, the observed behavioral plasticity of yearling males may be best interpreted as a means of adjusting their behavioral tactics to levels of male-male competition that can vary within and between breeding seasons.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.