Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1985 25(3):861-871; doi:10.1093/icb/25.3.861
© 1985 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MILTON TAUB, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Male-Infant Interactions in Baboons and Macaques: A Critique and Reevaluation1

DAVID MILTON TAUB
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425 and Yemassee Primate Center Yemassee, South Carolina 29945

A critical reexamination of the empirical data on male-infant interactions among baboons and macaques reveals a number of significant contrasts between them. On an absolute and relative scale, the frequency of occurrence among baboons is rare. When male baboons do interact with infants, only a small proportion of all available male actors do so, and even fewer still (less than one-quarter) account for any substantial percentage of all interactions. In contrast, macaque males are very frequently and commonly involved with infants; all males of the group interact with infants to some degree, and a greater proportion of all the group's males can be characterized as "heavily involved" with infants. The rejection of the role of kinship in interpreting this phenomenon, especially as it occurs among baboons, has rested almost exclusively on the pattern of estimated paternity between male and infant from behavioral (consort) criteria. These behavioralbased data are incomplete at best, possibly incorrect in some instances, and in fact, in many studies kinship appears to be a predominant factor. Until patrilineal data are derived from independent cytogenetic studies, these evolutionary interpretations must be viewed with extreme skepticism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.