Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1986 26(1):145-157; doi:10.1093/icb/26.1.145
© 1986 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ABLE, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by FELLEY, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Geographical Variation in Fundulus heteroclitus: Tests for Concordance Between Egg and Adult Morphologies1

KENNETH W. ABLE and JAMES D. FELLEY
Biological Sciences and Center for Coastal and Environmental Studies,Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, McNeese State University Lake Charles, Louisiana 70609

Recent studies have shown distinct patterns of variation in the egg morphology (oil droplet number, diameter and density of chorionic filaments) of Fundulus heteroclitus along the east coast (including Chesapeake and Delaware bays). We tested the hypothesis that variation in adult morphology and in electromorphs is concordant with that of egg morphology over the same range by subjecting data for these character sets to the Mantel test. This analysis was based on data for three egg characters, nineteen adult morphological (meristic and morphometric) characters and five protein characters from locations along the Atlantic coast. If the geographical differences observed among locations reflect genetic differences between two forms that have established secondary contact after isolation, we would expect general concordance between the different character sets. We would expect little concordance between the sets if they are each affected by different selectional and/or developmental responses to environmental regimes. Our analyses indicate that patterns of variation among localities for meristic, egg, and genetic character sets are all concordant, and thus the observed differences among locations are likely the result of secondary intergradation between two previously isolated forms. These conclusions are supported by similar patterns of geographical variation in spawning site preference and body coloration. Thus, these results support our earlier suggestion that these morphs should be treated as separate taxa, with F. h. heteroclitus occurring along the east coast from New Jersey south to Florida including lower Chesapeake and Delaware bays and F. h. macrolepidotus distributed from Connecticut north to Newfoundland with disjunct populations in upper Chesapeake and Delaware bays. Intergrade zones occur where the two morphs come together along the east coast in northern New Jersey and on Long Island, as well as in Chesapeake and Delaware bays


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.