Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1986 26(1):51-69; doi:10.1093/icb/26.1.51
© 1986 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BELOVSKY, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Generalist Herbivore Foraging and Its Role in Competitive Interactions1

GARY E. BELOVSKY
School of Natural Resources, The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1115

Whether herbivores are food limited and compete interspecifically for food has been debated by population/community ecologists. To examine this proposition, a mechanistic approach based upon autecological observations is employed:

  1. 45 foraging studies of 20 species of generalist herbivores indicate that the herbivores behave as energy maximizers in their diet selection, as determined by a linear programming model.
  2. The constraints that determine the forager's energy maximizing diet can be used to determine whether a food item should be consumed, based upon a minimum digestibility that determines energy value and a minimum item size or abundance that determines cropping rate.
  3. Population densities of a number of herbivore species depend upon the biomass of plants in the environment that satisfy the minimum characteristics sought by the herbivore.
  4. Using experimental populations for several herbivore species that are known to be food limited, it can be demonstrated that these species compete with each other. The competitive isoclines are non-linear and arise from the fractions of each forager's food resources that it shares and exclusively uses, which depend upon each species' minimum food characteristics.
  5. The results indicate that a mechanistic approach can provide considerable insights into herbivore community structure. The foraging constraints underlying the entire analysis may be body size dependent, providing a more general view.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.