Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1987 27(2):347-358; doi:10.1093/icb/27.2.347
© 1987 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by FEENER, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Defense of Food Supply by Eusocial Colonies1

LESLIE K. JOHNSON, STEPHEN P. HUBBELL and DONALD H. FEENER, JR.
Department of Biology, University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 52242 and Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado 2072, Balboa, Panama

Overdispersion of colonies exists in many eusocial insects. Overdispersion can be generated by direct attack on colonies or founders, by defense of space, by defense of food resources being harvested, or by exploitative competition. When direct competitive interactions lead to colony overdispersion, territoriality is said to occur. Whereas solitary territory holders typically defend space, most eusocial colonies defend resource patches rather than space per se. Also unlike solitary territory holders, colonies with forager communication can simultaneously defend several spatially separated food patches. A model explores optimal numbers of scouts (discoverers of patches) and recruits (followers) needed to maximize net rate of energy intake by the colony. Territorial costs are added to the model by requiring a higher investment of foragers per unit resource collected. According to the model, optimal colony size and percentage scouts are more sensitive to changes in patch size than in patch density. If patch defense is required for resource control, a decline occurs in optimal percentage of scouts; the decline is greatest for small colonies. Colonies that must defend patches in order to harvest from them suffer a loss in net energy intake; the loss is greatest for small colonies. It is predicted that among eusocial insects, those with territorial defense of resources should preferentially visit large patches and have comparatively large colony sizes and relatively few scouts. Ways of testing these predictions are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.