Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1987 27(3):909-920; doi:10.1093/icb/27.3.909
© 1987 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GETZ, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by CARTER, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mating System and Population Fluctuations of the Prairie Vole, Microtus ochrogaster1

LOWELL L. GETZ, JOYCE E. HOFMANN and CAROL S. CARTER
Department of Ecology, Ethology and Evolution University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Illinois Natural History Survey Champaign, Illinois 61820
Department of Zoology, University of Maryland College Park, Maryland 20742

The basic mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, consists of monogamous breeding units comprised of one reproductive female and male and their offspring. Most surviving young remain at the natal nest; those that do so normally remain non-reproductive. Of 281 total breeding units monitored in free-living populations 50.2% were monogamous. Twenty-seven percent consisted of a single reproductive female that apparently has lost her mate. Theremaining 22.8% of the breeding units included two or more unrelated adults males and/or females (=‘complex’ breeding units). In general, monogamy was the predominant type of breeding unit at the highest (>100 adults/ha) as well as at low (>20 adults/ha) population densities. There was no consistent relationship between the number of residents of a breeding unit and population density. Significantly more young females remaining at the natal nest became reproductive at high rather than at low population densities (77.1 and 17.6%, respectively). Monogamy was prevalent during the winter as well as during the other seasons; however, there were significantly more complex breeding units during the winter than during other seasons. Breeding unit size was significantly larger during the winter than at other seasons. There was no difference in the proportions of breeding unit types or the number of residents of a breeding unit during breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Increased breeding unit size appears related to low temperatures and associated physiological stresses during the winter rather than to population density.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.