Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1988 28(1):137-146; doi:10.1093/icb/28.1.137
© 1988 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRANCH, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by DONNELLY, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Temperature and Food as Factors Influencing Oxygen Consumption of Intertidal Organisms, Particularly Limpets1

GEORGE M. BRANCH, PETER BORCHERS, CHRISTOPHER R. BROWN and DI DONNELLY
Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch 7700, South Africa

SYNOPSIS: In intertidal animals rates of oxygen consumption span an order of magnitude (even when standardised for body size and temperature). This may reflect different adaptations to this variable habitat. Temperatures range widely and potentially increase metabolic expenditure during the heat of the day, while periods of feeding may be restricted. The balance between intake and expenditure of energy may limit zonation, body size, and even mode of reproduction. One pattern is that species suffering shortage of food ("conservers") have low rates of oxygen consumption while those with abundant food ("exploiters") have high rates. Conservers appear to have several means of reducing metabolic costs, but exploiters maintain high (seemingly wasteful) rates of oxygen consumption.

Oxygen consumption cannot, however, be considered separately, since it reflects turnover,including growth rate and reproductive output. There is also the question whether differences between species are genetically controlled, or simply phenotypic responses to food availability. Comparisons of populations with different amounts of food suggest that exploiters substantially reduce oxygen consumption when food is scarce, but conservers are relatively fixed in their pattern of slow growth and low reproductive output, even if food is experimentally increased.

Growth and reproduction are positively correlated, at least within taxonomically related groups (as exemplified by patellacean limpets) but both are inversely related to longevity.Thus growth and reproduction are not necessarily "traded off," but are both low in "conservers" and both high in "exploiters."


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.