Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1988 28(1):97-114; doi:10.1093/icb/28.1.97
© 1988 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCMAHON, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Respiratory Response to Periodic Emergence in Intertidal Molluscs1

ROBERT F. MCMAHON
Section of Comparative Physiology, Department of Biology, Box 19498, The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, Texas 76019

SYNOPSIS: The ratio of aerial: aquatic Formula was computed for species of intertidal molluscs. This ratio was <1 for sub- and lower littoral species suggesting partial anaerobiosis in air and >1 for high littoral archeogastropods suggesting high metabolic demands in air. Formula ratios were near unity for meso- and neogastropod species regardless of zonation. Littoral fringe mesogastropods had ratios <1 reflecting reduced activity on emergence. A major gastropod adaptation to increasing emergence is reduction of ctenidium surface area and formation of a mantle cavity lung. Mid- and high littoral pulmonates with both a mantle cavity lung and secondary gills have Formula ratios near unity. In contrast, littoral fringe pulmonates without secondary gills are partially anaerobic in water. Emerged low and mid-littoral bivalves close the valves, are almost entirely anaerobic, have Formula ratios ≤0.14:1 and conserve energy by greatly reducing metabolic demand in air. In contrast, emerged high littoral bivalves remain aerobic by periodic gaping and mantle cavity ventilation. Such behaviors support an aerobic metabolism while minimizing evaporative water loss. Aerial gas exchange prevents anaerobic end-product accumulation and, with a reduction in energy demand, allows efficient energy store utilization during prolonged emergence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.