Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1990 30(2):287-298; doi:10.1093/icb/30.2.287
© 1990 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRUETT-JONES, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Parasites and Sexual Selection in Birds of Paradise1

S. G. PRUETT-JONES2,, M. A. PRUETT-JONES3, and H. I. JONES4,
Department of Biology C-016, University of California at San Diego La folia, California 92093
Natural Reserve System, Scripps Institution of Oceanography A-001, University of California at San Diego La Jolla, California 92093
Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands Western Australia 6009, Australia

We studied blood parasite infections in relation to aspects of sexual selection and mate choice in 10 species of birds of paradise. Across species there was a significant, positive correlation between relative parasite intensity and showiness in males. Parasite infections also correlated across species with the degree of sexual dimorphism and varied with mating systems. Promiscuous species were showier and had significantly higher parasite prevalences than monogamous species. Within one species, Lawes' Parotia (Parotia lawesii), parasite intensity was negatively correlated with all phenotypic traits examined, a pattern significantly different than random. The mating success of males with low parasite intensities varied, but males with high intensities did not mate. Sampling of individual males on repeated occasions revealed large temporal differences in parasite counts which spanned the range believed to affect behavior and mating success. Whereas the interspecific correlations support one prediction of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis on parasites and sexual selection, the intraspecific data are equivocal with respect to a second prediction of this hypothesis. Parasites appear to influence the behavior of Lawes' Parotia, but alternative explanations to that of Hamilton and Zuk for this effect are equally plausible and there is no evidence of a link between female choice and the traits in males indicative of parasite loads. We suggest that female Lawes' Parotia may be avoiding highly infected males rather than actively choosing parasite-resistant males.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.