Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1990 30(2):299-312; doi:10.1093/icb/30.2.299
© 1990 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAUSFATER, G.
Right arrow Articles by KLUMP, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Parasites and Mate Choice in Gray Treefrogs, Hyla versicolor1

GLENN HAUSFATER2, H. CARL GERHARDT and GEORG M. KLUMP3
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri 65211

A fundamental assumption of the Hamilton and Zuk (1982) model of sexual selection is that parasite-free males should produce mate attracting displays that are substantially more vigorous and effective than those of their parasitized counterparts. Further, the model predicts that parasite-free males should be preferred as mating partners by females and, as a consequence, should have higher reproductive success than their parasitized competitors. Gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor) constitute an ideal species for testing both assumptions and predictions of the Hamilton-Zuk model in that: (i) mate attraction by males requires the production of energetically costly calls and (ii) males of this species have been shown to harbor a wide range of helminth parasites. The present paper summarizes results of analyses of calling and mating behavior by male gray treefrogs in relation to their parasite infection levels. In general, these analyses revealed no consistent relationship between the number and kinds of parasites harbored by males and either the duration or duty-cycle (a direct measure of energetic cost) of their calls. Furthermore, males found in amplexus (i.e., males actually selected as mating partners by females) showed a slightly higher prevalence of parasite infection (but a slightly lower intensity of infection) than did a comparable sample of unmated males. In sum, the present study failed to support the major within-species prediction of the Hamilton-Zuk model of sexual selection and also calls into question one of the fundamental assumptions of the model.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.