Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1994 34(3):437-451; doi:10.1093/icb/34.3.437
© 1994 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAGNUSON, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by MCLAIN, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Insights on Species Richness and Turnover from Long-Term Ecological Research: Fishes in North Temperate Lakes1

JOHN J. MAGNUSON, BARBARA J. BENSON and ANN S. MCLAIN
Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706

SYNOPSIS. We examined eleven years of annual survey data on fish assemblages in seven lakes. Expectations based on biogeographic literature were that, owing to the isolation of lakes, fish species structure should be relatively stable and species turnover low. Our original objective was to determine whether lakes house relatively stable fish assemblages or ones with high rates of species turnover. Methodological issues became apparent that caused us to consider issues of rare species and sample sufficiency.Our data were from samples rather than complete counts and rare species could have been missed. In our results mean annual richness was considerably lower than cumulative richness. In addition, species turnover was overestimated and decreased exponentially as the number of yearsbetween observation increased. Sampling variability might explain these results; however, given the same number of survey years, cumulative richness increased with the number of years between observations. Apparently extinctions and invasions occurred even within eleven years, but uncertainty remains because rare taxa can be missed and their appearances and disappearances in the record influence estimates of richness and turnover. To compensate for this problem we removed rare taxa and corrected turnover rates by removing an estimate of sampling error (the turnover rate between adjacent years). Even using these conservative approaches, estimates of turnover among lakes ranged from 0.36% to 0.50% per year. Because the threshold for species detection by most sampling regimes is greater than zero, survey data are expected to underestimate species richness and overestimate species turnover even with standardized methods. Conservation biologists should evaluate claims of decline in species richness against such considerations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.