Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1994 34(4):570-585; doi:10.1093/icb/34.4.570
© 1994 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EMLET, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Body Form and Patterns of Ciliation in Nonfeeding Larvae of Echinoderms: Functional Solutions to Swimming in the Plankton?1

RICHARD B. EMLET
Institute of Marine Biology and Department of Biology, University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420

SYNOPSIS. Nonfeeding larval forms of echinoderms are believed to have evolved repeatedly from feeding larval forms, and these transformations usually result in major shifts in morphogenesis. Current hypotheses on form change invoke relaxation of stabilizing selection on traits that functionin feeding, coupled with selection for rapid development of juvenile traits. However, comparative evidence from 51 species of nonfeeding larvae, representing 19 independent origins, suggests that body form, patterns of ciliation, and possibly buoyancy reflect functional requirements for maintenance of swimming performance. Nonfeeding larvae with body lengths less than 600 µm usually have several transverse ciliated bands, while those with body lengths greater than 800 µm usually have uniform ciliation. A preliminary model which compares estimated drag and buoyancy forces with ciliary propulsive forces predicts that bands of simple cilia do not produce sufficient propulsive forces to permit swimming in larger larvae. For larger larvae, increases in areal coverage of cilia may be required to produce propulsive forces sufficient to oppose drag and buoyancy forces and permit movement. For these larger larvae, estimates of water velocities at the tips of uniform arrays of cilia are well below the upper limits of water movements by cilia of echinoderms. Functional constraints on nonfeeding larval forms should be considered, along with (above mentioned) current hypotheses, in explanations of morphogenetic changes associated with transition from feeding to nonfeeding larval development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.