Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1996 36(4):459-470; doi:10.1093/icb/36.4.459
© 1996 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UETZ, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Risk Sensitivity and the Paradox of Colonial Web-Building in Spiders1

GEORGE W. UETZ
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0006

Group foraging is rare in spiders, occurring only where prey availability is high. If colonial web-building increases individual prey capture rates as shown, why does group foraging not occur more often where prey are scarce? Risk sensitivity may explain this paradox, as variance in prey capture is reduced in groups; risk-averse spiders should join groups only when prey exceed a threshold level. Field studies show that group foraging varies as predicted between species, between populations of a single species, and between sites within a population. However, recent models suggest the necessity of examining variance within individuals over time rather than between individuals within populations. Additionally, mechanisms responsible for variance reduction in colonial webs may be less effective than previously assumed. New field data suggest that while prey variance over time may be somewhat less for individual spiders in groups than for solitaries, the relationship between colonial web-building and variance in prey capture is far more complex than originally thought. The influence of risk sensitivity on reproductive success and the evolution of colonial web-building is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.