Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1998 38(1):118-132; doi:10.1093/icb/38.1.118
© 1998 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CREWS, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

On the Organization of Individual Differences in Sexual Behavior1

DAVID CREWS2
Institute of Reproductive Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712

Correspondence: 2E-mail address: crews{at}mail.utexas.edu

SYNOPSIS. Research on the sexual differentiation of mating behavior has impeded progress in our understanding of the proximate bases of individual differences in two ways. First, by viewing variation as categorical rather than continuous, and second, by not placing sufficient emphasis on the fact that males and females differ genetically in many vertebrates, environmental contributions to individual differences cannot be distinguished from genetic contributions. Just as there are two levels of organization of sex, so, too, are there two levels of organization of the sexual phenotype. Primary organization is the process of sexual differentiation that follows gonadal determination and is manifest as the morphological, physiological and behavioral aspects of the sexual phenotype. There is a second, and subsequent, level of organization, however, that is directly related to primary organization and is the basis of individual variation in sexually dimorphic behaviors. This level can be termed secondary organization. Because individual variation is the substance of evolutionary change, understanding its organization will require both new paradigms and alternative animal model systems that allow separation of the effects of genes and hormones from environmental and experiential stimuli. The plasticity of the sexual phenotype and how each individual emerges from its own unique circumstances integrates these different levels of organization. As might be predicted, recent research suggests that the relationship between primary and secondary organization and the development of individual differences in sociosexual behaviors involves more than just sex steroid hormones.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.