Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1998 38(1):152-165; doi:10.1093/icb/38.1.152
© 1998 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DUVALL, D.
Right arrow Articles by BEAUPRE, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Sexual Strategy and Size Dimorphism in Rattlesnakes: Integrating Proximate and Ultimate Causation1

DAVID DUVALL*,2 and EVEN J. BEAUPRE{dagger}
*Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078
{dagger}Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

Correspondence: 2E-mail:duvalld{at}okway.okstate.edu

SYNOPSIS. Integrating proximate and ultimate causes and effects simultaneously in the study of behavior is challenging and complex, but useful. This is equivalent to asking both "How?" (in the sense of proximate mechanisms) and "Why?" (in the sense of ultimate evolutionary payoffs) an organism operates in one way and not another. Sex differences in rattlesnake (i) size and growth and (ii) mating and reproductive strategies and tactics, provide a good theoretical and empirical context in which to attempt such integration. We employ interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches in our behavioral and physiological work, but we mean something different by "integrative," that amounts to the simultaneous study of both proximate and ultimate levels of causation and explanation. Though not always feasible, this approach represents an important goal to work towards because it attempts to represent faithfully the complexity inherent in living systems. To this end, we also employ a variety of modeling approaches, which entrain intuition, generate new hypotheses, and sharpen inference. Individual-based simulations, for example, offer promise for broad, integrative programs of biological research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.