Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1999 39(2):389-400; doi:10.1093/icb/39.2.389
© 1999 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CRAWFORD, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by SEGAL, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Evolutionary Physiology of Closely Related Taxa: Analyses of Enzyme Expression1

DOUGLAS L. CRAWFORD2,*, VALERIE A. PIERCE{dagger} and JEFF A. SEGAL{ddagger}
*Division of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Missouri Kansas City Kansas City, Missouri 64110
{dagger}Department Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, California 92697
{ddagger}Lilly Research Laboratories, CNS Discovery Bldg. 48, Drop Code 0510, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285-0510

Correspondence: 2 E-mail: crawd{at}cctr.umkc.edu

Comparative biochemistry and physiology offer the advantage of specifically defining the functional parameters or traits that affect an organism's performance (e.g., amino acids that affect Km, enzymes that affect metabolism). By combining these functional determinations with both intraspecific and phylogenetically appropriate analyses, comparative biologists can indicate that a trait is biologically important by demonstrating that it is evolving by natural selection. An evolutionary approach may benefit from the analysis of variation within and among closely related species. The advantages of analyzing closely related species are that they allow one to identify more definitively the derived conditions and suggest why differences arose. Importantly, there is substantial variation in physiological and biochemical traits within and among closely related species. For example, among species within a single genus of teleost, Fundulus, the variation in enzyme expression is similar to the variation seen among most superorders of teleost. However, most of the variation within the genus Fundulus is most readily explained by evolutionary distance, and thus there is no compelling reason for further adaptive hypotheses. Extending this observation, the greater the phylogenetic distance between taxa in a comparative study, the more likely there will be a statistically significant difference that may only represent evolutionary time. The molecular mechanisms affecting adaptive variation in enzyme expression appear to be readily altered and may vary within a species or between acclimation conditions. Thus, studies among closely related organisms are more likely to identify the specific molecular or biochemical changes responsible for adaptive variation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.