Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 2000 40(3):326-339; doi:10.1093/icb/40.3.326
© 2000 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mooi, R.
Right arrow Articles by David, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


What a New Model of Skeletal Homologies Tells Us About Asteroid Evolution1

Rich Mooi2,1 and Bruno David2
1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Geology, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118-4599
2 UMR CNRS 5561, Université de Bourgogne 6, bd. Gabriel F-21000, Dijon, France

The Extraxial-Axial Theory (EAT) is applied to the body wall homologies of asteroids. Attempts to characterize major plate systems of asteroids as axial or extraxial, particularly those that are highly organized into series, can be problematic. However, the Optical Plate Rule (OPR) is instrumental in establishing that ambulacrals and terminals are axial. It is equally clear that the region aboral to the marginal frame is a part of the perforate extraxial body wall (with the possible exception of the centrodorsal, which is likely imperforate extraxial). Previously established EAT criteria, particularly those strongly rooted in the embryologically expressed boundary between axial and extraxial body wall in larvae, suggest that marginals, and perhaps adambulacrals, are extraxial in origin. We also explore the extraxial nature and phylogenetic significance of the odontophore. Our data from both juveniles and adults show that plate and tube foot addition sequences occur according to the OPR, and shed light on poorly known homologies of the asteroid mouth frame. These data indicate that the mouth angle ossicle must at least contain the first ambulacral, although we cannot rule out the possibility that the first adambulacral also contributes to the construction of this ossicle. The interpretations provided by the EAT for all ossicles suggest a synapomorphy scheme for somasteroids, ophiuroids, and asteroids.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.