Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 2000 40(5):748-758; doi:10.1093/icb/40.5.748
© 2000 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gayon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


History of the Concept of Allometry1

Jean Gayon2,1
1 UFR GHSS, Université Paris 7, case courrier 7001, 2 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France

Synopsis. Allometry designates the changes in relative dimensions of parts of the body that are correlated with changes in overall size. Julian Huxley and Georges Teissier coined this term in 1936. In a joint paper, they agreed to use this term in order to avoid confusion in the field of relative growth. They also agreed on the conventional symbols to use in the algebraic formula: y = bx{alpha}. Julian Huxley is often said to have discovered the "law of constant differential growth" in 1924, but a similar formula had been used earlier by several authors, in various contexts, and under various titles. Three decades before Huxley, Dubois and Lapicque used a power law and logarithmic coordinates for the description of the relation between brain size and body size in mammals, both from an intraspecific, and an interspecific, point of view. Later on, in the 1910s and early 1920s, Pézard and Champy's work on sexual characters provided decisive experimental evidence in favor of a law of relative growth at the level of individual development.

This paper examines: (1) early works on relative growth, and their relation to Huxley and Teissier's "discovery"; (2) Teissier and Huxley's joint paper of 1936, in particular their tacit disagreement on the signification of the coefficient "b"; and (3) the status of allometry in evolutionary theory after Huxley, especially in the context of paleobiology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.