© 2002 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Coevolution and Maladaptation1
1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Earth and Marine Sciences Building, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064
2 Section of Integrative Biology C0930, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
3 
School of Biological Sciences and Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164
Many of the most commonly cited examples of exquisite adaptation are of coevolved symbioses. As we learn more about the coevolutionary process, however, it is becoming increasingly evident that coevolution may also keep populations moderately maladapted much of the time. As a result, coevolving populations may only rarely occupy adaptive peaks, because the selective landscape is under continual change through reciprocal selection on the species themselves. These shifting patterns of coadaptation are further shaped by the geographic structure of most species. Selection mosaics across landscapes and coevolutionary hotspots can favor different evolutionary trajectories in different populations. The combined action of gene flow, random genetic drift, and local extinction of populations may then continually remold these local patterns, creating a geographic mosaic in the degrees of maladaptation found within local interactions. Recent mathematical models of the geographic mosaic of coevolution suggest that complex mosaics of maladaptation are a likely consequence of spatially structured species interactions. These models indicate that the spatial structure of maladaptation may depend upon the type of coevolutionary interaction, the underlying selection mosaic, and patterns of gene flow across landscapes. By maintaining local polymorphisms and driving the divergence of populations, coevolution may produce spatial patterns of maladaptation that are a source of ongoing innovation and diversification in species interactions.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A.-L. Laine Role of coevolution in generating biological diversity: spatially divergent selection trajectories J. Exp. Bot., June 23, 2009; (2009) erp168v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. G. Stokke, I. Hafstad, G. Rudolfsen, A. Moksnes, A. P. Moller, E. Roskaft, and M. Soler Predictors of resistance to brood parasitism within and among reed warbler populations Behav. Ecol., February 24, 2008; (2008) arn007v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. D. Brodie III and B. J. Ridenhour Reciprocal Selection at the Phenotypic Interface of Coevolution Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 43(3): 408 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|