© 2002 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos1
1 Department of Biology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, Oregon 97219
The extraordinary adhesive capabilities of geckos have challenged explanation for millennia, since Aristotle first recorded his observations. We have discovered many of the secrets of gecko adhesion, yet the millions of dry, adhesive setae on the toes of geckos continue to generate puzzling new questions and valuable answers. Each epidermally-derived, keratinous seta ends in hundreds of 200 nm spatular tips, permitting intimate contact with rough and smooth surfaces alike. Prior studies suggested that adhesive force in gecko setae was directly proportional to the water droplet contact angle (
) , an indicator of the free surface energy of a substrate. In contrast, new theory suggests that adhesion energy between a gecko seta and a surface (WGS) is in fact proportional to 
, and only for > 60°. A reanalysis of prior data, in combination with our recent study, support the van der Waals hypothesis of gecko adhesion, and contradict surface hydrophobicity as a predictor of adhesion force. Previously, we and our collaborators measured the force production of a single seta. Initial efforts to attach a seta failed because of improper 3D orientation. However, by simulating the dynamics of gecko limbs during climbing (based on force plate data) we discovered that, in single setae, a small normal preload, combined with a 5 µm displacement yielded a very large adhesive force of 200 microNewton (µN), 10 times that predicted by whole-animal measurements. 6.5 million setae of a single tokay gecko attached maximally could generate 130 kg force. This raises the question of how geckos manage to detach their feet in just 15 ms. We discovered that simply increasing the angle that the setal shaft makes with the substrate to 30° causes detachment. Understanding how simultaneous attachment and release of millions of setae are controlled will require an approach that integrates levels ranging from molecules to lizards.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. T. Asbeck, S. Kim, M. R. Cutkosky, W. R. Provancher, and M. Lanzetta Scaling Hard Vertical Surfaces with Compliant Microspine Arrays The International Journal of Robotics Research, December 1, 2006; 25(12): 1165 - 1179. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Vanhooydonck, A. Herrel, and D. J. Irschick Out on a limb: the differential effect of substrate diameter on acceleration capacity in Anolis lizards J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4515 - 4523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Autumn, C. Majidi, R. E. Groff, A. Dittmore, and R. Fearing Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3558 - 3568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Autumn, A. Dittmore, D. Santos, M. Spenko, and M. Cutkosky Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3569 - 3579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. I. Goldman, T. S. Chen, D. M. Dudek, and R. J. Full Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2990 - 3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Federle Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2006; 209(14): 2611 - 2621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Autumn, S. T. Hsieh, D. M. Dudek, J. Chen, C. Chitaphan, and R. J. Full Dynamics of geckos running vertically J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 260 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Jagota and S. J. Bennison Mechanics of Adhesion Through a Fibrillar Microstructure Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1140 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|