Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2003 43(1):137-147; doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.137
© 2003 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balavoine, G.
Right arrow Articles by Adoutte, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


The Segmented Urbilateria: A Testable Scenario1

Guillaume Balavoine2,1 and André Adoutte1
1 Centre de Génétique Moléculaire du CNRS, Avenue de la Terrasse, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

The idea that the last common ancestor of bilaterian animals (Urbilateria) was segmented has been raised recently on evidence coming from comparative molecular embryology. Leaving aside the complex debate on the value of genetic evidence, the morphological and developmental evidence in favor of a segmented Urbilateria are discussed in the light of the emerging molecular phylogeny of metazoans. Applying a cladistic character optimization procedure to the question of segmentation is vastly complicated by the problem of defining without ambiguity what segmentation is and to what taxa this definition applies. An ancestral segmentation might have undergone many complex derivations in each different phylum, thus rendering the cladistics approaches problematic. Taking the most general definitions of coelom and segmentation however, some remarkably similar patterns are found across the bilaterian tree in the way segments are formed by the posterior addition of mesodermal segments or somites. Postulating that these striking similarities in mesodermal patterns are ancestral, a scenario for the diversification of bilaterians from a metameric ancestor is presented. Several types of evolutionary mechanisms (specialization, tagmosis, progenesis) operating on a segmented ancestral body plan would explain the rapid emergence of body plans during the Cambrian. We finally propose to test this hypothesis by comparing genes involved in mesodermal segmentation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
J. Paps, J. Baguna, and M. Riutort
Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insights from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes
Proc R Soc B, April 7, 2009; 276(1660): 1245 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. Hejnol and M. Q Martindale
Acoel development supports a simple planula-like urbilaterian
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1493 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. G. M. Extavour
Evolution of the bilaterian germ line: lineage origin and modulation of specification mechanisms
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 47(5): 770 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
P. Sundberg and M. Strand
Annulonemertes (phylum Nemertea): when segments do not count
Biol Lett, October 22, 2007; 3(5): 570 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. G. M. Extavour
Gray anatomy: phylogenetic patterns of somatic gonad structures and reproductive strategies across the Bilateria
Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 47(3): 420 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.