© 2003 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measuring Performance in Nature: Implications for Studies of Fitness Within Populations1
1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118
Significant relationships among morphology, behavior, performance and fitness have long served as bona fide evidence for the role of selection in shaping natural populations. Here, I discuss how studies of ecological performance, or how organisms perform in nature, provide an ecological context for such selection studies. Laboratory studies assume that the level of performance expressed under "optimal" conditions accurately reflects the level of performance used in nature, but I show here that this assumption is not always borne out. A review of how various factors affect ecological performance (ontogeny, microhabitat, and macrohabitat) show that animals often express very different levels of movement speed both among different tasks, and when comparing laboratory versus field performance. Thus, a failure to take this variation into account could lead to negative, or even misleading significant fitness-character correlations. While laboratory performance studies should continue to play a key role in studies of selection, recent technological (i.e., portable high-speed cameras) and methodological developments should enable researchers to measure performance in nature to high degrees of accuracy. Thus, I encourage researchers to measure performance both in the laboratory and in the field, and thus expand the traditional paradigm of morphology
performance
fitness to morphology
ecological performance
fitness.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. Husak, D. J. Irschick, S. D. McCormick, and I. T. Moore Hormonal regulation of whole-animal performance: Implications for selection Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2009; 49(4): 349 - 353. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Rybczynski Woodcutting behavior in beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia): estimating ecological performance in a modern and a fossil taxon Paleobiology, September 1, 2008; 34(3): 389 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Adolph and T. Pickering Estimating maximum performance: effects of intraindividual variation J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1336 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Dangles, D. Pierre, J. P. Christides, and J. Casas Escape performance decreases during ontogeny in wild crickets J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3165 - 3170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Lailvaux Interactive effects of sex and temperature on locomotion in reptiles Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 47(2): 189 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nikinmaa and W. Waser Molecular and cellular studies in evolutionary physiology of natural vertebrate populations: influences of individual variation and genetic components on sampling and measurements J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1847 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Novack-Gottshall Using a theoretical ecospace to quantify the ecological diversity of Paleozoic and modern marine biotas Paleobiology, March 1, 2007; 33(2): 273 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Dangles, C. Magal, D. Pierre, A. Olivier, and J. Casas Variation in morphology and performance of predator-sensing system in wild cricket populations J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): 461 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


