Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2004 44(6):403-412; doi:10.1093/icb/44.6.403
© 2004 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Sensitivity of Intraspecific Latitudinal Clines of Body Size for Tetrapods to Sampling, Latitude and Body Size1

Kyle G. Ashton2,1
1 Department of Biology, Kutztown University, Kutztown, Pennsylvania 19530

Recent studies have shown that most tetrapod groups (mammals, birds, chelonians, amphibians) show general intraspecific tendencies for increasing body size with latitude, whereas squamates (lizards and snakes) show an intraspecific tendency towards decreasing body size with latitude. Here I evaluate whether these size trends are general by using independent contrasts analysis to investigate the dependence of intraspecific size-latitude relationships (r), and the magnitude alone of size-latitude relationships ([r]), for tetrapod vertebrates, on sample size, range of latitudes sampled, average latitude sampled, and body size. Range of latitudes sampled, average latitude sampled, and body size did not influence body size-latitude relationships (r) or the magnitude alone of body size-latitude relationship ([r]). Sample size did not influence size-latitude relationships (r), but did influence the magnitude alone of size-latitude relationships ([r]), possibly indicating increased precision of estimating size-latitude relationships with increased sampling. In short, intraspecific size-latitude relationships are similar for species of different sizes, occurring at different latitudes, sampled over different latitudinal ranges, and differing in number of populations sampled (though magnitude alone is influenced by sample size). These results suggest that intraspecific size-latitude trends are general, and biologically significant (i.e., are not artifacts of sampling), thus deserving explanation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Garland Jr, A. F. Bennett, and E. L. Rezende
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3015 - 3035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
W. U. Blanckenhorn and M. Demont
Bergmann and Converse Bergmann Latitudinal Clines in Arthropods: Two Ends of a Continuum?
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 413 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. W. Sears and M. J. Angilletta Jr.
Body Size Clines in Sceloporus Lizards: Proximate Mechanisms and Demographic Constraints
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 433 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
G. Davidowitz and H. F. Nijhout
The Physiological Basis of Reaction Norms: The Interaction Among Growth Rate, the Duration of Growth and Body Size
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 443 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. J. Angilletta Jr., T. D. Steury, and M. W. Sears
Temperature, Growth Rate, and Body Size in Ectotherms: Fitting Pieces of a Life-History Puzzle
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 44(6): 498 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.