Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005 45(3):416-425; doi:10.1093/icb/45.3.416
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konarzewski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lapo, I. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology

Artificial Selection on Metabolic Rates and Related Traits in Rodents1

Marek Konarzewski2,1, Aneta Ksiazek1 and Iwona B. Lapo2
1 Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, 15-950 Bialystok,
2 Institute for Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Wólka Kosowska, Poland

Artificial selection experiments are potentially powerful, yet under-utilized tool of evolutionary and physiological ecology. Here we analyze and review three important aspects of such experiments. First, we consider the effects of instrumental measurement errors and random fluctuations of body mass on the total phenotypic variation. We illustrate this with the analysis of measurements of oxygen consumption in an open-flow respirometry set-ups. We conclude that measurement errors and fluctuations of body mass are likely to reduce the repeatability of oxygen consumption by about one third. Using published estimates of repeatability of metabolic rates we also showed that it does not tend to decline with increasing time between measurements. Second, we review data on narrow sense heritability (h2) of metabolic rates in mammals. The results are equivocal: many studies report very low (~0.1) h2, whereas some recent studies (including our own estimates of h2 in laboratory mice, obtained by means of parent-offspring regression) report significant h2 ≥ 0.4. Finally, we discuss consequences of the lack of replicated lines in artificial selection experiments. We focus on the confounding effect of genetic drift on statistical inferences related to primary (selected) and secondary (correlated) traits, in the absence of replications. We review literature data and analyze them following the guidelines formulated by Henderson (1989, 1997). We conclude that most results obtained in unreplicated experiments are probably robust enough to ascribe them to the effect of selection, rather than genetic drift. However, Henderson's guidelines by no means should be treated as a legitimate substitute of the analysis of variance, based on replicated lines.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
K. M. Middleton, S. A. Kelly, and T. Garland Jr
Selective breeding as a tool to probe skeletal response to high voluntary locomotor activity in mice
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 18, 2008; (2008) icn057v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. F. Nespolo and M. Franco
Whole-animal metabolic rate is a repeatable trait: a meta-analysis
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 2000 - 2005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. G. Swallow and T. Garland Jr.
Selection Experiments as a Tool in Evolutionary and Comparative Physiology: Insights into Complex Traits--an Introduction to the Symposium
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 387 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.