Skip Navigation

Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005 45(5):903-914; doi:10.1093/icb/45.5.903
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauber, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology

Bateman's Principle in Cooperatively Breeding Vertebrates: The Effects of Non-breeding Alloparents on Variability in Female and Male Reproductive Success1

Mark E. Hauber2,1,2 and Eileen A. Lacey2
1 Ecology, Evolution, and Behaviour, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
2 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3160

The sex-specific slopes of Bateman's gradients have important implications for understanding animal mating systems, including patterns of sexual selection and reproductive competition. Intersexual differences in the fitness benefits derived from mating with multiple partners are expected to yield distinct patterns of reproductive success for males and females, with variance in direct fitness predicted to be greater among males. These analyses assume that typically all adults are reproductive and that failure to produce offspring is non-adaptive. Among some species of cooperatively breeding birds and mammals, however, non-breeding adult alloparents are common and may comprise the majority of individuals in social groups. The presence of a large number of non-breeding adults, particularly when coupled with greater social suppression of reproduction among females, may alter the relative variance in direct fitness between the sexes, thereby generating an apparent contradiction to Bateman's Paradigm. To explore quantitatively the effects of non-breeding alloparents on variance in reproductive success, we used genetic estimates of parentage and reproductive success drawn from the literature to calculate the relative variability in direct fitness for females and males in alloparental and "other" societies of birds and mammals. Our analyses indicate that in mammals and, to a lesser extent, in birds, variability in direct fitness is greater among females in species characterized by the presence of non-breeding alloparents. These data suggest that social interactions, including social suppression of reproduction, are powerful determinants of individual direct fitness that may modify sex-specific patterns of reproductive variance from those described by Bateman.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. Iossa, C. D. Soulsbury, P. J. Baker, K. J. Edwards, and S. Harris
Behavioral changes associated with a population density decline in the facultatively social red fox
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 385 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. D. Kelly
Identifying a causal agent of sexual selection on weaponry in an insect
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 184 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Clutton-Brock
Sexual Selection in Males and Females
Science, December 21, 2007; 318(5858): 1882 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.