Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on October 20, 2006
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2006 46(6):1169-1190; doi:10.1093/icb/icl052
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condition indices for conservation: new uses for evolving tools
* Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston MA 02125-3393, USA
Department of Biology, Tufts University Medford, MA 02155, USA
Correspondence: 1E-mail: robert.stevenson{at}umb.edu
Biologists have developed a wide range of morphological, biochemical and physiological metrics to assess the health and, in particular, the energetic status of individual animals. These metrics originated to quantify aspects of human health, but have also proven useful to address questions in life history, ecology and resource management of game and commercial animals. We review the application of condition indices (CI) for conservation studies and focus on measures that quantify fat reserves, known to be critical for energetically challenging activities such as migration, reproduction and survival during periods of scarcity. Standard methods score fat content, or rely on a ratio of body mass rationalized by some measure of size, usually a linear dimension such as wing length or total body length. Higher numerical values of these indices are interpreted to mean an animal has greater energy reserves. Such CIs can provide predictive information about habitat quality and reproductive output, which in turn can help managers with conservation assessments and policies. We review the issues about the methods and metrics of measurement and describe the linkage of CIs to measures of body shape. Debates in the literature about the best statistical methods to use in computing and comparing CIs remain unresolved. Next, we comment on the diversity of methods used to measure body composition and the diversity of physiological models that compute body composition and CIs. The underlying physiological regulatory systems that govern the allocation of energy and nutrients among compartments and processes within the body are poorly understood, especially for field situations, and await basic data from additional laboratory studies and advanced measurement systems including telemetry. For now, standard physiological CIs can provide supporting evidence and mechanistic linkages for population studies that have traditionally been the focus of conservation biology. Physiologists can provide guidance for the field application of conditions indices with validation studies and development of new instruments.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. K. Molnar, T. Klanjscek, A. E. Derocher, M. E. Obbard, and M. A. Lewis A body composition model to estimate mammalian energy stores and metabolic rates from body mass and body length, with application to polar bears J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2009; 212(15): 2313 - 2323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Biuw, L. Boehme, C. Guinet, M. Hindell, D. Costa, J.-B. Charrassin, F. Roquet, F. Bailleul, M. Meredith, S. Thorpe, et al. Variations in behavior and condition of a Southern Ocean top predator in relation to in situ oceanographic conditions PNAS, August 21, 2007; 104(34): 13705 - 13710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|