Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on July 27, 2006
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2006 46(6):743-759; doi:10.1093/icb/icl023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signaling mechanisms underlying metamorphic transitions in animals
* The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, University of Florida FL 32080, USA
Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida FL 32611, USA
Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington WA 98250, USA
Correspondence: 1E-mail: aheyland{at}ufl.edu
Correspondence: 2E-mail: moroz{at}whitney.ufl.edu
Metamorphosis in many animal groups involves a radical transition from a larval to a juvenile/adult body plan and the challenge of orchestrating 2 overlapping developmental programs simultaneously, that is, larval development and juvenile development. Metamorphic competence directly precedes this radical change in morphology and can be best described as the developmental potential of a larva to undergo the radical transition in response to internal or external signals. Several studies have employed genomic approaches (for example, microarrays or subtractive hybridization methods) to gain insights into the complexity of changes in gene expression associated with metamorphic transitions. Availability of this technology for an increasing number of organisms from diverse taxonomic groups expands the scope of species for which we can gain detailed understanding of the genetic and epigenetic architecture underlying metamorphosis. Here, we review metamorphosis in insects, amphibians, and several marine invertebrate species including the sea hare Aplysia californica and summarize mechanisms underlying the transition. We conclude that all metamorphoses share at least 4 components: (1) the differentiation of juvenile/adult structures, (2) the degeneration of larval structures, (3) metamorphic competence, and (4) change in habitat. While transcription levels detected by microarray or other molecular methods can vary significantly, some similarities can be observed. For example, transcripts related to stress response, immunity, and apoptosis are associated with metamorphosis in all investigated phyla. It also appears that signaling mediated by hormones and by nitric oxide can contribute to these stress-related responses and that these molecules can act as regulators of metamorphic transitions. This might indicate either that all of these distantly related organisms inherited the same basic regulatory machinery that was employed by their most recent common ancestor (RCA) in orchestrating life history transitions. Alternatively, these regulatory modules may have been used by the RCA for other purposes and have been independently co-opted to regulate metamorphic transitions in a variety of distantly related animals. We propose that such instances of independent origin or homoplasy in the evolution of metamorphosis might have resulted from specific constraints in signal transduction pathways. Modern genomic tools can help to further explore homoplastic signaling modules when used in a comparative context.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Santagata Evolutionary and Structural Diversification of the Larval Nervous System Among Marine Bryozoans Biol. Bull., August 1, 2008; 215(1): 3 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Hodin Expanding networks: Signaling components in and a hypothesis for the evolution of metamorphosis Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 719 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|