Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on May 2, 2007
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2007 47(1):107-117; doi:10.1093/icb/icm014
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The evolution of cranial design and performance in squamates: Consequences of skull-bone reduction on feeding behavior
*Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerpen, Belgium; Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.; Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Correspondence: 1E-mail: anthony.herrel{at}ua.ac.be
The evolution of cranial design in lepidosaurians is characterized by a general trend toward the loss of cranial elements. The evolution of relatively lighter skulls in squamates appears tightly coupled to a reduction in relative mass of the jaw adductor, implying functional consequences for bite force and feeding behavior. Interestingly, among squamates the postorbital bar was reduced or lost at least twice independently and taxa characterized by the loss of these cranial elements (e.g., geckos and varanids) are generally reported as having a mobile skull. In Gekkotans, the loss of the postorbital bar was accompanied by a reduction of the supratemporal bar, resulting in a pronounced cranial kinesis. Our data show that having a kinetic skull has functional consequences and results in a reduction in bite force. The lower bite force may in turn be responsible for the decreased feeding efficiency as reflected in the longer duration of intra-oral transport cycles. Gekkotans, however, appear to exploit their intracranial mobility in ways that increases the velocity of jaw movement during opening and closing, which may allow them to capture more elusive prey. The morphological changes observed in the evolution of the cranial system in squamates appear tightly linked to functional and constructional demands on the skull, making squamate skull evolution a model system to investigate the consequences of morphological changes in a complex integrated system of performance, behavior, and ecology.
From the symposium "The Evolution of Feeding Mechanisms in Vertebrates" presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparirtive Biology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, January 3–7, 2007.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.-Y. Mo, X. Xu, and S. E. Evans The evolution of the lepidosaurian lower temporal bar: new perspectives from the Late Cretaceous of South China Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2010; 277(1679): 331 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Moazen, N. Curtis, P. O'Higgins, S. E. Evans, and M. J. Fagan Biomechanical assessment of evolutionary changes in the lepidosaurian skull PNAS, May 19, 2009; 106(20): 8273 - 8277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Moazen, N. Curtis, P. O'Higgins, M. E.H Jones, S. E Evans, and M. J Fagan Assessment of the role of sutures in a lizard skull: a computer modelling study Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2009; 276(1654): 39 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Schaerlaeken, A. Herrel, P. Aerts, and C. F. Ross The functional significance of the lower temporal bar in Sphenodon punctatus J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2008; 211(24): 3908 - 3914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|