Skip Navigation


Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2007
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2007 47(5):759-769; doi:10.1093/icb/icm050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/5/759    most recent
icm050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plachetzki, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Oakley, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Key transitions during the evolution of animal phototransduction: novelty, "tree-thinking," co-option, and co-duplication

David C. Plachetzki1 and Todd H. Oakley
Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology. The University of California-Santa Barbara, CA 93106

Correspondence: 1E-mail: plachetzki{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu

Biologists are amazed by the intricacy and complexity of biological interactions between molecules, cells, organisms, and ecosystems. Yet underlying all this biodiversity is a universal common ancestry. How does evolution proceed from common starting points to generate the riotous biodiversity we see today? This "novelty problem"—understanding how novelty and common ancestry relate—has become of critical importance, especially since the realization that genes and developmental processes are often conserved across vast phylogenetic distances. In particular, two processes have emerged as the primary generators of diversity in organismal form: duplication plus divergence and co-option. In this article, we first illustrate how phylogenetic methodology and "tree-thinking" can be used to distinguish duplication plus divergence from co-option. Second, we review two case studies in photoreceptor evolution—one suggesting a role for duplication plus divergence, the other exemplifying how co-option can shape evolutionary change. Finally, we discuss how our tree-thinking approach differs from other treatments of the origin of novelty that utilized a "linear-thinking" approach in which evolution is viewed as a linear and gradual progression, often from simple to complex phenotype, driven by natural selection.

From the symposium "Key Transitions in Animal Evolution" presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Integration and Comparitive Biology, January 3–7, 2007, at Phoenix, Arizona.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. Vopalensky and Z. Kozmik
Eye evolution: common use and independent recruitment of genetic components
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2009; 364(1531): 2819 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D.-E. Nilsson
The evolution of eyes and visually guided behaviour
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2009; 364(1531): 2833 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. Larhammar, K. Nordstrom, and T. A. Larsson
Evolution of vertebrate rod and cone phototransduction genes
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2009; 364(1531): 2867 - 2880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. E. Grus and J. Zhang
Origin of the Genetic Components of the Vomeronasal System in the Common Ancestor of all Extant Vertebrates
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2009; 26(2): 407 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
O. Sakarya, K. S. Kosik, and T. H. Oakley
Reconstructing ancestral genome content based on symmetrical best alignments and Dollo parsimony
Bioinformatics, March 1, 2008; 24(5): 606 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.