Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on May 6, 2008
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2008 48(2):213-225; doi:10.1093/icb/icn027
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions
Biology (Emeritus), Indiana University, 1001 E. 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
Correspondence: 1E-mail: nelson1{at}indiana.edu
The strength of the evidence supporting evolution has increased markedly since the discovery of DNA but, paradoxically, public resistance to accepting evolution seems to have become stronger. A key dilemma is that science faculty have often continued to teach evolution ineffectively, even as the evidence that traditional ways of teaching are inferior has become stronger and stronger. Three pedagogical strategies that together can make a large difference in students’ understanding and acceptance of evolution are extensive use of interactive engagement, a focus on critical thinking in science (especially on comparisons and explicit criteria) and using both of these in helping the students actively compare their initial conceptions (and publicly popular misconceptions) with more fully scientific conceptions. The conclusion that students’ misconceptions must be dealt with systematically can be difficult for faculty who are teaching evolution since much of the students’ resistance is framed in religious terms and one might be reluctant to address religious ideas in class. Applications to teaching evolution are illustrated with examples that address criteria and critical thinking, standard geology versus flood geology, evolutionary developmental biology versus organs of extreme perfection, and the importance of using humans as a central example. It is also helpful to bridge the false dichotomy, seen by many students, between atheistic evolution versus religious creationism. These applications are developed in detail and are intended to be sufficient to allow others to use these approaches in their teaching. Students and other faculty were quite supportive of these approaches as implemented in my classes.
From the symposium "Evolution vs. Creationism in the classroom: Evolving student attitudes" presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 2–6, 2008, at San Antonio, Texas.