Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1965 5(2):277-286; doi:10.1093/icb/5.2.277
© 1965 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREGORY, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

MICROSAURS AND THE ORIGIN OF CAPTORHINOMORPH REPTILES

JOSEPH T. GREGORY
Dept. of Paleontology, University of California Berkeley

Microsaurs are Paleozoic lepospondylous Amphibia with slender bodies and weak limbs. Their solidly roofed skulls lack otic notches, have large supratemporals widely separating the squamosal from parietal, and double occipital condyles. The stapes consists of a large footplate and extremely short columella. Vertebrae lack intercentra. Originally based on a reptile, Hylonomus lyelli, by Dawson in 1863, the Order Microsauria has long been restricted to these small amphibians (Romer, 1950). Repeated confusion between primitive captorhinomorph reptiles and microsaurs steins from superficial similarities between both skulls and vertebrae. This confusion and occasional microsaur-like vertebrae in early Carboniferous deposits have led to suggestions that microsaurs are reptilian ancestors (cf. Vaughn, 1962).

Captorhinomorphs differ from microsaurs in their small supratemporal bone, single occipital condyle, stapes with long columella reaching a pit in the quadrate and bearing a dorsal process, and dorsal intercentra. Captorhinomorph ancestors were probably not labyrinthodonts, as Vaughn (1960) has pointed out, but they could not have had the characteristic specializations of microsaurs. Their source must be sought in forms much closer to crossopterygian fish.

Microsaurs resemble both urodeles and gymnophionans in their double occipital joint and otic region. They differ from Lissamphibia in the absence of a non-calcified zone in the teeth. At present, no criteria indicate decisively which structures developed convergently. Microsaurs are possibly but not demonstrably related to the ancestry of modern salamanders and caecilians.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.