Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1967 7(2):233-252; doi:10.1093/icb/7.2.233
© 1967 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JORDAN, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by ALLEN, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Numbers, Turnover, and Social Structure of the Isle Royale Wolf Population

PETER A. JORDAN1, PHILIP C. SHELTON2 and DURWARD L. ALLEN
Department of Forestry and Conservation, Purdue University Lafayette, Indiana

Observations of wolves on Isle Royale are reported for 1961–66, with interpretations including the earlier 3-year period described by Mech (1966). On this 210-square-mile island the fully protected wolf population varied from approximately 22 to 28 in midwinter. The major and minor foods were moose and beaver, respectively.

The main pack varied in number between 11 and 22 with about three breeding pairs believed present. The population remained relatively stable; mating occurred every winter; and adult mortality appeared to be low. High mortality among pups seemed to be the point of population control. Socio-economic factors may have controlled the size of the large pack. Availability of food during the period of parturition and rearing probably was critical to survival of young.

Recruitment of young appeared to take place in years of high production of moose calves. Numbers in the large pack probably were curtailed through the progressive exclusion of aged and socially subordinate individuals. Under harassment these animals separated and became pack-following scavengers, then probably true loners ranging outside the area used by the pack. Smaller aggregations of two or three non-breeders were seen each winter, as were the loners, some of which appeared thin and weak.

The only known breeding outside the big pack was in a group of five present in the winter of 1965. This group was probably a family unit which separated from the main pack. A year later the male had disappeared, and remains of a pup, probably theirs, were found. In the winter of 1966 the alpha male of the large pack became lame and apparently was killed. This background appears favorable for further changes in social organization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.