Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1967 7(2):331-338; doi:10.1093/icb/7.2.331
© 1967 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THEBERGE, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by FALLS, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Howling as a Means of Communication in Timber Wolves

JOHN B. THEBERGE and J. BRUCE FALLS
1Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, B. C.
2Department of Zoology, University of Toronto Toronto 5, Ontario

The communicatory function of howling was studied in three adult male timber wolves (Canis lupus). Approximately 700 howls were subjected to spectrographic and auditory analysis. The fundamental frequency of howls was divided into beginning, mid-section, and ending, and each section was studied separately. Harmonic features were also examined. Much variation was found within the howls of each individual. However, unique features were found in all howls of two wolves, of potential value in individual recognition.

The variation in characteristics of the fundamental within howls of individuals was tested to see if it related to features of the animal's behavior or environment. Eleven significant relationships were found. The characteristics involved were considered potentially functional in conveying information of a behavioral or environmental nature.

Auditory discrimination was studied by stimulus-response experimentation involving simulated wolf howls by humans. By either howling in response or remaining silent, one wolf demonstrated an ability to detect the slight difference between live howls and recorded, played-back howls. This ability enhances the possibility that individual recognition and conveyance of information may take place by means of differences in howls.

Analysis of the circumstances in which spontaneous howling (no known auditory stimulation) occurred demonstrated that isolation resulted in increased howling.

A form of long-distance communication is important to a social unit whose members are often separated. This study suggests that howling identifies the species, functions in the location of specific animals, provides specific information about the howling animal, and is, therefore, of great value in coordinating the social activities of wolves.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.