Integrative and Comparative Biology Advance Access originally published online on June 30, 2006
Integrative and Comparative Biology 2006 46(4):508-518; doi:10.1093/icb/icj051
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution of segment regeneration ability in the Annelida
Biology Department, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA
Correspondence: 1E-mail: abely{at}umd.edu
The annelids are an excellent group in which to investigate the evolution of regeneration abilities. They exhibit qualitative and quantitative variation in regeneration ability, including among closely related species, and their segmental body organization makes comparing results among species relatively straightforward. Here, I compile information on the presence/absence of segment regeneration ability across the annelids. The ability to regenerate posteriorly appears to be nearly universal in the annelids. It is almost certainly ancestral for the phylum and may have been lost only a few times. The ability to regenerate anteriorly is common but less widespread. It is absent in about a dozen groups, almost surely representing multiple independent losses of this ability. Several non-regenerating species are closely related to regenerating species, indicating very recent losses (or gains). Despite the fact that lack of this ability is unusual, there is a publication bias against reporting the lack of regeneration ability, and in many cases the judgment that a particular species is unable to regenerate is based on incomplete or unpublished data. Thus, in order to build rigorous frameworks for future comparative studies of annelid regeneration, there is a need for published studies clearly documenting the lack of regeneration abilities in annelid species. The review of regeneration data presented here is especially useful in highlighting annelid groups that possess both regenerating and non-regenerating representatives. Investigations of these groups may be particularly useful for elucidating the mechanisms leading to the loss (or perhaps gain) of segment regeneration ability.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. E. Bely and J. M. Sikes Latent regeneration abilities persist following recent evolutionary loss in asexual annelids PNAS, January 26, 2010; 107(4): 1464 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Berke, V. Cruz, and R. W. Osman Sublethal Predation and Regeneration in Two Onuphid Polychaetes: Patterns and Implications Biol. Bull., December 1, 2009; 217(3): 242 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Weisblat and D.-H. Kuo Helobdella (Leech): A Model for Developmental Studies CSH Protocols, April 1, 2009; 2009(4): pdb.emo121 - pdb.emo121. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.J Glasby, S.P Glasby, and F Pleijel Worms by number Proc R Soc B, September 22, 2008; 275(1647): 2071 - 2076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|