© 2001 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Water Stress, Osmolytes and Proteins1
1 Whitman College, Biology Department, Walla Walla, Washington 99362
 |
SYNOPSIS |
|---|
TOP
 SYNOPSIS INTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
Organic osmolytes are small solutes used by cells of numerous water-stressed organisms and tissues to maintain cell volume. All known osmolytes are amino acids and derivatives, polyols and sugars, methylamines, and urea; unlike salt ions, most are "compatible," i.e., do not perturb macromolecules. In addition, some stabilize macromolecules and are "counteracting" towards perturbants, e.g., methylamines can stabilize proteins and ligand binding against perturbations by urea in elasmobranchs and mammalian kidney, and (our latest findings) high hydrostatic pressure in deep-sea animals. Methylamines appear to coordinate water molecules tightly, resulting in osmolyte exclusion from hydration layers of peptide backbones. This makes unfolded protein conformations entropically unfavorable (work of Timasheff, Galinski, Bolen and coworkers). These properties have led to proposed uses in biotechnology, agriculture and medicine, including improved biochemical methods, in vitro rescue of misfolded proteins in cystic fibrosis and prion diseases (work of Welch and others), and plants engineered for drought and salt tolerance. These properties also explain some but not all of the considerable variation in osmolyte composition among species with different metabolisms and habitats, and among and within mammalian tissues in development.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
Modern biology has revealed a remarkable similarity at the molecular level underlying the enormous diversity of life. Most biomolecular research has focused on the macromolecules. But these operate in vivo in a medium dominated by "micromolecules"—most notably water, electrolytes, metabolites, and osmolytes (regulators of cell volume) (Fig. 1)—forming a milieu with an evolutionary history and properties that are less studied (Yancey et al., 1982
). Gerstein and Levitt (1998) state: "When scientists publish models of biological molecules in journals, they usually draw their models ... against a plain, black background. We now known that the background in which these molecules exist—water—is just as important as they are." Yet even they overlook the other significant micromolecules of the cellular milieu, with osmolytes in particular having important interactions with water and macromolecules. I will focus on these properties within the context of osmolyte primary function: adapting cells to water stress (see other papers in this symposium for osmolyte regulation). Because of recent reviews (Yancey, 1994; Gilles, 1997; Somero and Yancey, 1997), I will present primarily new findings, which continue to expand with many exciting discoveries and actual or proposed applications.
|
Considered here as a cellular disturbance due to water loss, water stress arises from evaporation into air or osmosis into concentrated aqueous surroundings. The latter may be due to saline habitats, physiological function (e.g., concentrated salt in mammalian kidneys), extracellular freezing, or disease (e.g., diabetes). Some cells survive such osmotic stress, but initially they may show disturbances, e.g., reduced growth rates of bacteria (Record et al., 1998
), mammalian renal cells (Yancey and Burg, 1990) and embryos (Dawson and Baltz, 1997). For cells that successfully adapt, three generalizations have emerged. First, during short-term water loss cells often restore volume with inorganic ions as osmolytes (Land et al., 1998) while upregulating stress ("heat-shock") proteins (Petronini et al., 1993; Sheikh-Hamad et al., 1994; Smith et al., 1999), possibly indicating disturbances in protein structures (Fig. 2).
|
Second, under long-term water stress, organic osmolytes replace ions for volume regulation, while stress proteins decline (Fig. 2). Such osmolyte use is widespread, from some Archaea to mammalian tissues such as kidney and brain. High levels of inorganic ions appear to be incompatible with long-term normal protein function, as perhaps are stress proteins, which may provide no protection against osmotic stress (Yancey and Walsh, 1994
, Gagnon et al., 1999). Third, these solutes are limited to a few chemical types (Yancey et al., 1982) shown Figure 1.
Only the evolutionarily ancient halophilic Archaea, restricted to marginal habitats such as brine ponds, appear to rely extensively on inorganic osmolytes at high concentrations. They osmoconform to the brine by accumulating K+ up to 7 M, mostly exclude environmental NaCl, and have proteins with many acidic amino acids (e.g., glutamate) that bind both water and K+, and which do not allow proper conformation in the absence of high K+ (Lanyi, 1974).
|
COMPATIBILITY PROPERTIES |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
What selective forces have resulted in this conservation of or convergence on similar organic osmolytes (Fig. 1), with the (metabolically "cheaper") inorganic ions usually disfavored? The "compatibility" hypothesis of Brown and Simpson (1972)
, later extended by Clark, Somero, Wyn Jones and others (Wyn Jones et al., 1977; Yancey et al., 1982), recognizes that inorganic ions (especially NaCl) at high levels disrupt protein function in vitro, but the major osmolytes usually do not, even at several molar for some. K+ salts sometimes show intermediate stimulation coinciding with typical cellular K+ levels, but perturb at higher concentrations. These effects are similar with enzymes from species without osmolytes, leading to an important corollary: effects of salt and organic osmolytes should be general features of protein-solute-water interactions, not of specific adaptations in proteins structure. Use of organic osmolytes should maintain functions without significant disruptions over a wide range of external salinities. An example is shown Figure 3A; new studies continue to provide support.
|
General compatibility has been tested in vivo by manipulating cell osmolytes, hypothesizing that cells under hyperosmotic stress will suffer if osmolyte levels are reduced, or will do better if given osmoprotectants (exogenous compatible osmolytes or precursors). The eubacterium E. coli, for which growth slows with increasing external osmolality, uses K+ and glutamate as major osmolytes. Salt inhibition of DNA-protein binding may be relieved in vivo by increased concentration of reactants in shrunken cells (Record et al., 1998b
). Nevertheless, cell growth is inhibited, and is greatly improved by extracellular betaine, which through uptake replaces cellular K+ and glutamate (Fig. 3B) (Record et al., 1998a).
Similarly, one line of mammalian renal medullary cells (PAP-HT25) in hyperosmotic culture uses primarily sorbitol as an osmolyte. When production of sorbitol was inhibited, cell growth dropped in parallel with declining cell sorbitol content (inhibition had no effect in normal medium, in which these cells use little sorbitol) (Yancey et al., 1990a). However, addition of betaine (normally absent) to the medium largely reversed the decreased viability, in parallel to betaine uptake (Moriyama et al., 1991). Another line of renal cells suffered when deprived of myo-inositol, but improved when betaine was provided (Kitamura et al., 1997). With more normal cells of rat renal medulla, in both primary cultures (Rohr et al., 1999) and in vivo (Yancey et al., 1990b), inhibition of sorbitol synthesis triggered a compensating increase in betaine, such that there were no osmotic imbalances or apparent damage.
Among non-renal cells, mouse hybridoma cells grew better in hyperosmotic media when given betaine, sarcosine, or dimethylglycine; protection increased with higher methylation (Øyaas et al., 1994a). Providing betaine to cultured SV-3T3 cells reduced stress protein expression and enhanced survival in osmotic shock (Petronini et al., 1993). Several studies have shown that mammalian embryos, exposed in vivo to hyperosmotic oviductal fluids, grow better in vitro in hyperosmotic media when provided organic osmolytes (Dawson and Baltz, 1997).
|
STABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING PROPERTIES |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
Many studies, often unrelated to osmolyte research, have shown the ability of these types of solutes to stabilize macromolecular structure in vitro in a variety of systems and disturbances (Yancey, 1994
). While many studies use solutes well above physiological levels, in four natural stresses—anhydrobiosis, extreme temperatures, perturbing solutes, and high hydrostatic pressure—there is good evidence that stabilizing properties (beyond simple compatibility) are important in vivo. Such solute effects are variously termed "counteracting" (Yancey et al., 1982), "compensatory" (Gilles, 1997), or "chemical chaperoning" (Brown et al., 1996).
Anhydrobiosis
Disaccharides, most notably trehalose, build up in anhydrobiotic dormant organisms (e.g., baker's yeast). However these sugars do not follow the mechanisms of non-interactive compatibility. Rather they bind to macromolecules and membranes, effectively replacing water. See Crowe et al., 1992, for details.
Extreme temperature
For freezing adaptations, see Storey (1997). Though not a water stress per se, high-temperature stress reveals key properties. Numerous studies show that most osmolytes increase protein thermal stability in vitro (reviewed by Yancey, 1994). Methylamines (Yancey, 1994) and trehalose (Sola-Penna and Meyer-Fernandes, 1998) are often most effective. In vivo, carbohydrates may dominate: the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus accumulates ß-mannosylglycerate with osmotic stress and di-myo-inositol phosphate with thermal stress; the latter solute is a potent protein thermostabilizer (Martin et al., 1999). And heat stress induces accumulation of sorbitol in at least one insect (Wolfe et al., 1998) and trehalose in yeast (De Virgilio et al., 1991).
Perturbing solutes
Some organic osmolytes are able to offset some effects of solutes that perturb macromolecules. As organic osmolyte or waste product, urea (Fig. 1) is such a perturbant. At concentrations in marine cartilaginous fishes and mammalian kidneys, urea alters many macromolecular structures and functions (usually disrupting). However, non-estivating urea-accumulating animals (cartilaginous fishes, amphibia, mammalian kidneys) usually have other osmolytes, mainly methylamines such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO; Fig. 1).
Our first studies showed methylamines to exhibit not just simple compatibility, but often enhancement of protein activity and stability. This property was additive with urea effects such that they counteract, most effectively at about a 2:1 urea:TMAO ratio (similar to physiological levels, about 400:200 mM in cartilaginous fishes) (Yancey et al., 1982). These discoveries have been extensively confirmed in a variety of systems, some shown in Figures 3A and 4A, B. TMAO is usually a better stabilizer than other osmolytes including betaine (Yancey, 1994; Sackett, 1997; Göller and Galinski, 1999), perhaps explaining why TMAO is preferred in these fishes. Like compatibility, counteraction occurs whether a protein is from a urea-accumulating tissue or not, and thus may reflect universal mechanisms (Yancey et al., 1982).
The "counteracting-osmolytes" hypothesis proposes that a mixture is more beneficial than urea or methylamine alone, since the latter might "overstabilize" (Yancey et al., 1982). Using cultured renal cells, we found that adding high urea or betaine alone to the medium greatly reduced cell growth. However, adding both partly or fully restored normal growth (Yancey and Burg, 1990). In vivo, the mammalian renal medulla appears to regulate one of its methylamine osmolytes, glycerophosphorylcholine (GPC), to match urea contents (Peterson et al., 1992).
Methylamines can sometimes offset perturbing salt effects. Pollard and Wyn Jones (1979) first showed glycine and methylated derivatives counteracted NaCl inhibited of a plant enzyme's activity, with protection increasing with methylation. Many other studies show partial or full counteraction by methylamines of salt inhibition, including complex systems; e.g., TMAO (more than betaine) reverses the salt disruption of barnacle muscle fiber architecture (Clark, 1985) and inhibited force in mammalian muscle fibers (Nosek and Andres, 1998).
High hydrostatic pressure
The newest counteraction example is in the deep sea, where high hydrostatic pressure can perturb proteins (Siebenaller and Somero, 1989). In shallow marine animals, TMAO is usually found at <100 mmol kg–1 wet wt. (except in cartilaginous fish). Recently we found deep-sea teleosts and other animals have up to 300 mmol kg–1 (Fig. 5A), increasing with depth and thus perhaps related to pressure (Gillett et al., 1997; Kelly and Yancey, 1999). Testing found that, unlike glycine, TMAO offset pressure-inhibited stability of several LDH homologues (Yancey and Siebenaller, 1999) and polymerization of actin (Yancey et al., 2001). TMAO also offset pressure-induced increases in enzyme Km values (Fig. 4C).
|
|
We recently found that some deep-sea species do not have TMAO, possibly because their taxa lack synthesis pathways. However they do have high levels of rare osmolytes, including scyllo-inositol in echinoderms, and hypotaurine and methyltaurine in vestimentiferans (Yin et al., 1999
). We are currently testing the effects of these on proteins under pressure. |
OSMOLYTE MECHANISMS |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
A key premise of the compatible and counteracting hypotheses is they should involve universal water-solute-macromolecule interactions, the initial explanation proposed independently by Clark (see Clark, 1985
) and Wyn Jones and co-workers (1977). They noted that amino acid and methylamine osmolytes are structurally similar to Hofmeister ions, which form a ranking of anions and cations based on consistent solution effects: kosmotropes [such as N(CH3)4+] generally salt out, enhance catalysis by, and stabilize macromolecules, while chaotropes [such as Mg2+] do the opposite (Collins and Washabaugh, 1985). Effects are additive, leading to counteraction if opposing ion types are paired. Of note is that both methylated organic osmolytes and inorganic ions are usually the best stabilizers.
These universal properties are only partly understood. Inorganic and organic chaotropes may be attracted to protein functional groups; e.g., urea appears to unfold proteins by hydrogen bonding (Wu and Wang, 1999). Or they may bind to water less well than water does to itself, resulting in sequestering of solute away from bulk water (since water-water binding is more favorable than water-solute binding) towards surfaces. This preferential interaction will unfold macromolecules because that maximizes favored surface interactions.
In contrast, organic kosmotropes (except for carbohydrates in anhydrobiosis) exhibit an empirical tendency to be excluded from a protein's hydration shell (Timasheff, 1992). This preferential exclusion creates an entropically unfavorable order with neighboring regions of high and low solute (Fig. 6). Proteins reduce this order by minimizing their exposed surface areas, by folding more compactly, by aggregation or precipitation (salting out); i.e., they will be stabilized. Binding of ligands to active sites will be favored if this involves loss of bound water. This would explain counteraction of pressure also (Yancey and Siebenaller, 1999), as pressure inhibits release of hydration water from substrates and proteins in cases where volume expansion occurs (Fig. 6) (Siebenaller and Somero, 1989).
|
Differences in free energy between unfolded and native RNase T1 for the peptide backbone in solutions of 1 M urea, 0.5 M TMAO, or both (Net); showing that urea favors unfolding, TMAO favors folding and can offset the urea effect (data from Wang and Bolen, 1997The forces causing preferential exclusion are incompletely understood, with several proposed mechanisms in two broad categories (from Low, 1985
; and Timasheff, 1992): (1) Steric exclusion: any large dissolved solute takes up more space than a water molecule, and if binding well to water and not attracted to a protein, it will be less able to pack next to it than water. This model may apply to carbohydrate osmolytes, whose -OH groups may fit them into the water lattice readily, effectively replacing water molecules, but with a poorer geometrical fit than water at protein surfaces.
(2) Water structuring: Hofmeister (Collins and Washabaugh, 1985) and zwitterionic organic stabilizers may bind to water molecules better than to other solutes or than water to itself, and enhance water-water hydrogen bonding beyond their immediate hydration layer. Evidence includes reduced translational self-diffusion of water in osmolyte solutions (Clark, 1985), the tendency of most stabilizers to raise water surface tension (Timasheff, 1992), and molecular dynamic simulations showing that TMAO tightly coordinates water molecules (Noto et al., 1995). Methylamines often show the strongest effects; e.g., they elute faster than predicted from polyacrylamide gel columns, indicating firmly bound hydration shells (Galinski et al., 1997). Recently Wang and Bolen (1997) have shown that unfavorable interactions between TMAO and peptide backbones in particular explain the strong exclusion of TMAO, and thus its enhancement of protein folding (Fig. 6). Finally, Wiggins (1997) proposes that hydrophobic methyl groups can help alter water structure to favor native protein conformations only when on a charged atom, which repels these groups from each other to prevent hydrophobic aggregation.
|
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
Properties of osmolytes are increasingly useful in molecular biology and biotechnology. Stabilizing osmolytes improve reconstitution of functioning prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein-membrane complexes (Maloney and Ambudkar, 1989
) and improve crystallization of proteins (Jeruzalmi and Steitz, 1997). Non-detergent sulfobetaines (similar to methylated taurines) are similarly useful with membrane proteins (Vuillard et al., 1998). Betaine improves cell-free transcription including PCR (Henke et al., 1997; Hethke et al., 1999), and in combination with hyperosmotic medium, it maximized monoclonal antibody production by hybridoma cells (Øyaas et al., 1994b). Finally, certain osmolytes such as TMAO work better than others in stabilizing proteins in freeze-thaw cycles (Göller and Galinski, 1999).
Also, medically related aspects of osmolytes are increasingly important. Hyperglycemia in diabetes mellitus leads to build-up of the osmolyte sorbitol, with implications for treatment (Burg and Kador, 1988; Yancey et al., 1990 a, b). Pathogenic bacteria have been found to use trace amounts of human urinary osmolytes (including betaine, presumably from the kidney) to grow well in the presence of salts and urea. This could play a role in urinary tract infections and in drug design for treatment (Peddie et al., 1999).
Welch and colleagues have suggested that osmolytes as "chemical chaperones" might rescue misfolded proteins in human diseases. They showed that 75–100 mM TMAO can indeed restore function of one form of cystic fibrosis mutant protein (Fig. 7A) (Brown et al., 1996), and can inhibit the formation of aberrant protein aggregates in scrapie prion disease (Tatzelt et al., 1996). Conversely, we have found that GPC and TMAO can enhance formation of the undesirable ß-amyloid complex (Fig. 7B), associated with Alzheimer's disease. Interestingly, the methylamines GPC, creatine and choline are excessively high in brains of Alzheimer's patients (Wurtman, 1992; Pfefferbaum et al., 1999).
|
A final application is in agriculture. Transfer of genes for osmolyte production from salt-tolerant into salt-intolerant species is being used to adapt plants for saline and drought conditions (Tarczynski et al., 1993
). |
EXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
It seems likely that the use of organic osmolytes should speed up evolutionary adaptation relative to the alternative of altering most cell macromolecules to function in a dehydrated or concentrated ion solution (Yancey et al., 1982
). However, there are some exceptions and inconsistencies involving compatibility and counteraction. For example, as universal as preferential exclusion may be for stabilizers, it does not always correlate with effects on protein function (Yancey, 1994; Randall et al., 1998; Burg et al., 1999). Wiggins (1997) proposes that gross protein stability may be less important than (poorly understood) solvation properties of active sites in explaining osmolyte effects on protein function at physiological concentrations.
Remaining to be fully explained is why osmolytes in freezing adaptation are primarily carbohydrates (Storey, 1997), and why many organisms in other water stresses use mixtures of osmolytes, often of different classes. The need to cope with both high salt and urea probably explains why renal cells use both compatible polyols and counteracting methylamines (Bagnasco et al., 1986). However, why do renal cells seem to regulate GPC but not betaine with urea (above)? Are betaine, sorbitol and inositol equivalent in compatibility (as suggested by renal experiments, above)? And while GPC does counteract urea, there is yet no consistent evidence that is a better stabilizer than betaine (Fig. 4A) (Burg et al., 1996).
Finally, it is clear that some osmolytes have unique non-osmotic roles other than counteraction. Taurine, for example, high in mammalian heart and brain (Fig. 5B) and many marine invertebrates, may be an antioxidant (among other properties) (reviewed by Miller et al., 2000). Proline accumulation in water-stressed plants may be primarily for maintaining redox states than for compatibility or stabilizing aspects (see Cushman, 2001). And cyclitols that aid plants in water retention may also scavenge free radicals generated during drought and cold and other stresses (Orthen et al., 1994). Finally, there is evidence that TMAO can induce the formation of S-S bonds in proteins via hydrogen bonding (—) in the reaction SH—ON 
S–—H+ON, creating reactive sulfides (Brzezinksi and Zundel, 1993). But in many cases the selective rationales for certain osmolyte patterns and types in certain organisms are not known. For example, for unclear reasons, contents of osmolyte-type compounds differ and change dramatically in different ways among mammalian tissues during development (Fig. 5B). Further studies on unique properties of osmolytes need to be conducted.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 From the Symposium Osmoregulation: An Integral Approach presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, 4–8 January 2000, at Atlanta, Georgia.
2 E-mail: yancey{at}whitman.edu
|
References |
|---|
|
TOP
SYNOPSISINTRODUCTIONCOMPATIBILITY PROPERTIESSTABILIZING AND COUNTERACTING...OSMOLYTE MECHANISMSPRACTICAL APPLICATIONSEXCEPTIONS, OTHER FUNCTIONS, AND...References |
|---|
Bagnasco, S., R. Balaban, H. Fales, Y.-M. Yang, and M. Burg. 1986. Predominant osmotically active organic solutes in rat and rabbit renal medullas. J. Biol. Chem, 261:5872-5877.
Borowitzka, L. 1985. Glycerol and other carbohydrate osmotic effectors. In R. Gilles and M. Gilles-Ballien (eds.), Transport processes, iono-and osmoregulation, pp. 437–453. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Brown, A., and J. Simpson. 1972. Water relations of sugar-tolerant yeasts: The role of intracellular polyols. J. Gen. Microbiol, 72:589-591.
Brown, C. R., L. Q. Hong-Brown, J. Biwersi, A. S. Verkman, and W. J. Welch. 1996. Chemical chaperones correct the mutant phenotype of the 
F508 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein. Cell Stress Chaper, 1:117-125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Burg, M. B., and P. F. Kador. 1988. Sorbitol, osmoregulation, and the complications of diabetes. J. Clin. Invest, 81:635-640.[Web of Science][Medline]
Burg, M. B., E. D. Kwon, and E. M. Peters. 1996. Glycerophosphorylcholine and betaine counteract the effect of urea on pyruvate kinase. Kidn. Int. 50 Suppl, 57:S100-S104.
Burg, M. B., E. M. Peters, K. M. Bohren, and K. H. Gabbay. 1999. Factors affecting counteraction by methylamines of urea effects on aldose reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 96:6517-6522.
Brzezinksi, B., and G. Zundel. 1993. Formation of disulphide bonds in the reaction of SH group-containing amino acids with trimethylamine N-oxide. FEBS Lett, 333:331-333.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Clark, M. E. 1985. The osmotic role of amino acids: Discovery and function. In R. Gilles and M. Gilles-Ballien (eds.), Transport processes, iono- and osmoregulation, pp. 412–423. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Collins, K. D., and M. W. Washabaugh. 1985. The Hofmeister effect and the behavior of water at interfaces. Quar. Rev. Biophys, 18:323-422.[Medline]
Crowe, J. H., F. A. Hoekstra, and L. M. Crowe. 1992. Anhydrobiosis. Ann. Rev. Physiol, 54:579-599.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cushman, J. C. 2001. Osmoregulation in plants: implications for agriculture. Amer. Zool, 41:758-769.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Dawson, K. M., and J. M. Baltz. 1997. Organic osmolytes and embryos: Substrates of the Gly and ß Transport systems protect mouse zygotes against the effects of raised osmolarity. Biol Repro, 56:1550-1558.[Abstract]
De Virgilio, C., P. Piper, T. Boller, and A. Wiernken. 1991. Acquisition of thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae without heat shock protein hsp 104 and in the absence of protein synthesis. FEBS Lett, 288:86-90.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gagnon, F., S. N. Orlov, and P. Hamet. 1999. Heat stress preconditioning does not protect renal epithelial Na+, K+, Cl- and Na+, Pi cotransporters from their modulation by severe heat stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1421:163-166.[Medline]
Galinkski, E. A., M. Stein, B. Amendt, and M. Kinder. 1997. The kosmotropic (structure-forming) effect of compensatory solutes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 117A:357-365.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerstein, M., and M. Levitt. 1998. Simulating water and the molecules of life. Sci. Am, 279:100-105.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gilles, R. 1997. "Compensatory" organic osmolytes in high osmolarity and dehydration stresses: History and perspectives. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 117A:279-290.
Gillett, M. B., J. R. Suko, F. O. Santoso, and P. H. Yancey. 1997. Elevated levels of trimethylamine oxide in muscles of deep-sea gadiform teleosts: A high-pressure adaptation? J. Exper. Zool, 279:386-391.[CrossRef]
Göller, K., and E. A. Galinski. 1999. Protection of a model enzyme (lactate dehydrogenase) against heat, urea and freeze-thaw treatment by compatible solute additives. J. Mol. Catal. B, 7:37-45.
Henke, W., K. Herdel, K. Jung, D. Schnorr, and S. A. Loening. 1997. Betaine improves the PCR amplification of GC-rich DNA sequences. Nuc. Acids Res, 25:3957-3958.
Hethke, C., A. Bergerat, W. Hausner, P. Forterre, and M. Thomm. 1999. Cell-free transcription at 95°: Thermostability of transcriptional components and DNA topology requirements of Pyrococcus transcription. Genetics, 152:1325-1333.
Jeruzalmi, D., and T. A. Steitz. 1997. Use of organic cosmotropic solutes to crystallize flexible proteins: Application to T7 RNA polymeras and its complex with the inhibitor T7 lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol, 274:748-756.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kelly, R. H., and P. H. Yancey. 1999. High contents of trimethylamine oxide correlating with depth in deep-sea teleost fishes, skates, and decapod crustaceans. Biol. Bull, 196:18-25.[Abstract]
Kitamura, H., A. Yamauchi, T. Nakanishi, Y. Takamitsu, T. Sugiura, A. Akagi, T. Moriyama, M. Horio, and E. Imai. 1997. Effects of myo-inositol transport on MDCK cells under hyperosmotic environment. Am. J. Physiol, 272:F267-F272.[Medline]
Lang, F., G. L. Busch, and H. Völkl. 1998. The diversity of volume regulatory mechanisms. Cell Physiol. Biochem, 8:1-45.[Web of Science][Medline]
Lanyi, J. 1974. Salt-dependent properties of proteins from extremely halophilic bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev, 38:272-290.
Low, P. S. 1985. Molecular basis of the biological compatibility of nature's osmolytes. In R. Gilles and M. Gilles-Ballien (eds.), Transport processes, iono- and osmoregulation, pp. 469–477. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Maloney, P. C., and S. V. Ambudkar. 1989. Functional reconstitution of prokaryote and eukaryote membrane proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 269:1-10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Martin, D. D., R. A. Ciulla, and M. F. Roberts. 1999. Osmoadaptation in Archaea. Appl. Env. Microbiol, 65:1815-1825.
Miller, T. J., R. D. Hanson, and P. H. Yancey. 2000. Developmental changes in organic osmolytes in prenatal and postnatal rat tissues. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 125:45-56.
Moriyama, T., A. García-Perez, A. D. Olson, and M. B. Burg. 1991. Intracellular betaine substitutes for sorbitol in protecting renal medullary cells from hypertonicity. Am. J. Physiol, 260:F494-F497.[Medline]
Nosek, T. M., and M. A. W. Andrews. 1998. Ion-specific protein destabilization of the contractile proteins of cardiac muscle fibers. Plügers Arch.-Eur. J. Physiol, 435:394-401.
Noto, R., V. Martorana, A. Emanuele, and S. L. Fornili. 1995. Comparison of the water perturbations induced by two small organic solutes: Ab initio calculations and molecular dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Soc. Farad. Trans, 91:3803-3808.[CrossRef]
Orthen, B., M. Popp, and N. Smirnoff. 1994. Hydroxyl radical scavenging properties of cyclitols. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin, 102B:269-272.
Øyaas, K., T. E. Ellingsen, N. Dyrset, and D. W. Levine. 1994a.. Utilization of osmoprotective compounds by hybridoma cells exposed to hyperosmotic stress. Biotech. Bioeng, 43:77-89.[CrossRef]
Øyaas, K., T. E. Ellingsen, N. Dyrset, and D. W. Levine. 1994b.. Hyperosmotic hybridoma cell cultures: Increased monoclonal antibody production with addition of glycine betaine. Biotech. Bioeng, 44:991-998.[CrossRef]
Peddie, B. A., M. Lever, K. Randall, and S. T. Chambers. 1999. Osmoprotective activity, urea protection, and accumulation of hydrophilic betaines in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Ant. van Leeuw, 75:183-189.[CrossRef]
Peterson, D. P., K. M. Murphy, R. Ursino, K. Streeter, and P. H. Yancey. 1992. Effects of dietary protein and salt on rat renal osmolytes: Co-variation in urea and GPC contents. Am. J. Physiol, 263:F594-F600.[Web of Science][Medline]
Petronini, P. G., E. M. De Angelis, A. F. Borghetti, and K. P. Wheeler. 1993. Effect of betaine on HSP70 expression and cell survival during adaptation to osmotic stress. Biochem. J, 293:553-558.[Medline]
Pfefferbaum, A., E. Adalsteinsson, D. Spielman, E. V. Sullivan, and K. O. Lim. 1999. In vivo brain concentrations of N-acetyl compounds, creatine, and choline in Alzheimer's disease. Arch. Gen. Psych, 56:185-192.
Pollard, A., and R. G. Wyn Jones. 1979. Enzyme activities in concentrated solutions of glycinebetaine and other solutes. Planta, 144:291-298.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Randall, K., M. Lever, and S. T. Chambers. 1998. Counteraction of urea denaturation by glycine betaine and other kosmotropes. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Biophys, 2:51-58.
Record, M. T. Jr.,, E. S. Courtenay, D. S. Cayley, and H. J. Guttmann. 1998a.. Responses of E. coli to osmotic stress: Large changes in amounts of cytoplasmic solutes and water. Trends. Biochem. Sci, 23:143-148.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Record, M. T. Jr.,, E. S. Courtenay, D. S. Cayley, and H. J. Guttmann. 1998b.. Biophysical compensation mechanisms buffering E. coli protein-nucleic acid interactions against changing environments. Trends. Biochem. Sci, 23:190-194.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rhodes, D., and A. D. Hanson. 1993. Quaternary ammonium and tertiary sulfonium compounds in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol, 44:357-384.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Rohr, J. M., T. Hong, S. Truong, and P. H. Yancey. 1999. Effects of ascorbic acid, aminoguanidine, sorbinil and zopolrestat on sorbitol and betaine contents in cultured rat renal cells. Exper. Biol. Online, 4:3.
Sackett, D. L. 1997. Natural osmolyte trimethylamine N-oxide stimulates tubulin polymerization and reverses urea inhibition. Am. J. Physiol, 273:R669-R676.[Medline]
Sheikh-Hamad, D., A. Garcia-Perez, and M. B. Burg. 1994. Induction of gene expression by heat shock versus osmotic stress. Am. J. Physiol, 267:F28-F34.[Medline]
Siebenaller, J. F., and G. N. Somero. 1989. Biochemical adaptation to the deep sea. CRC Crit. Rev. Aq. Sci, 1:1-25.
Smith, T. R., G. C. Tremblay, and T. M. Bradley. 1999. Hsp70 and a 54 kDa protein (Osp54) are induced in salmon (Salmo salar) in response to hyperosmotic stress. J. Exper. Zool, 284:286-298.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sola-Penna, M., and J. R. Meyer-Fernandes. 1998. Stabilization against thermal inactivation promoted by sugars on enzyme structure and function: Why is trehalose more effective than other sugars? Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 360:10-14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Somero, G. N., and P. H. Yancey. 1997. Osmolytes and cell volume regulation: Physiological and evolutionary principles. In J. F. Hoffman and J. D. Jamieson (eds.), Handbook of physiology, Sec. 14. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Storey, K. B. 1997. Organic solutes in freezing tolerance. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 117A:319-326.
Tarczynski, M. C., R. G. Jensen, and H. J. Bohnert. 1993. Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte mannitol. Science, 259:508-510.
Tatzelt, J., S. B. Prusiner, and W. J. Welch. 1996. Chemical chaperones interfere with the formation of scrapie prion protein. EMBO J, 15:6363-6373.[Web of Science][Medline]
Timasheff, S. N. 1992. A physicochemical basis for the selection of osmolytes by nature. In G. N. Somero, C. B. Osmond, and C. L. Bolis (eds.), Water and life: A comparative analysis of water relationships at the organismic, cellular, and molecular levels, pp. 70–84. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Vuillard, L., T. Rabilloud, and M. E. Goldberg. 1998. Interactions of non-detergent sulfobetaines with early folding intermediates facilitate in vitro protein renaturation. Eur. J. Biochem, 256:128-135.[Web of Science][Medline]
Wang, A., and D. W. Bolen. 1997. A naturally occurring protective system in urea-rich cells: Mechanism of osmolyte protection of proteins against urea denaturation. Biochemistry, 36:9101-9108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wiggins, P. M. 1997. Hydrophobic hydration, hydrophobic forces and protein folding. Physica A, 238:113-128.[CrossRef]
Wolfe, G. R., D. L. Hendrix, and M. E. Salvucci. 1998. A thermoprotective role for sorbitol in the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii. J. Insect Physiol, 44:597-603.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wu, J.-W., and Z.-X. Wang. 1999. New evidence for the denaturant binding model. Prot. Sci, 8:2090-2097.[Web of Science][Medline]
Wurtman, R. J. 1992. Choline metabolism as a basis for the selective vulnerability of cholinergic neurons. Trends. Neuroci, 15:117-122.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wyn Jones, R. G., R. Storey, R. A. Leigh, N. Ahmad, and A. Pollard. 1977. A hypothesis on cytoplasmic osmoregulation. In E. Marre and O. Ciferri (eds.), Regulation of cell membrane activities in plants, pp. 121–136. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam.
Yancey, P. H. 1985. Organic osmotic effectors in cartilaginous fishes. In R. Gilles and M. Gilles-Ballien (eds.), Transport processes, iono- and osmoregulation, pp. 424–436. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Yancey, P. H. 1992. Compatible and counteracting aspects of organic osmolytes in mammalian kidney cells in vivo and in vitro. In G. N. Somero, C. B. Osmond, and C. L. Bolis (eds.), Water and life: A comparative analysis of water relationships at the organismic, cellular, and molecular levels, pp. 19–32. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Yancey, P. H. 1994. Compatible and counteracting solutes. In K. Strange (ed.), Cellular and molecular physiology of cell volume regulation, pp. 81–109. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Yancey, P. H., and M. B. Burg. 1990. Counteracting effects of urea and betaine on colony-forming efficiency of mammalian cells in culture. Am. J. Physiol, 258:R198-204.[Medline]
Yancey, P. H., M. B. Burg, and S. M. Bagnasco. 1990a.. Effects of NaCl, glucose and aldose reductase inhibitors on cloning efficiency of renal cells. Am. J. Physiol, 258:C156-C163.[Medline]
Yancey, P. H., M. E. Clark, S. C. Hand, R. D. Bowlus, and G. N. Somero. 1982. Living with water stress: Evolution of osmolyte systems. Science, 217:1212-1222.
Yancey, P. H., R. G. Haner, and T. Freudenberger. 1990b.. Effects of an aldose reductase inhibitor on osmotic effectors in rat renal medulla. Am. J. Physiol, 259:F733-F738.[Medline]
Yancey, P. H., A. L. Fyfe-Johnson, R. H. Kelly, V. P. Walker, and M. T. Auñón. 2001. Trimethylamine oxide counteracts effects of hydrostatic pressure on proteins of deep-sea teleosts. J. Exp. Zool. 289:172–176.
Yancey, P. H., and J. F. Siebenaller. 1999. Trimethylamine oxide stabilizes teleost and mammalian lactate dehydrogenases against inactivation by hydrostatic pressure and trypsinolysis. J. Exper. Biol, 202:3597-3603.[Abstract]
Yancey, P. H., and L. P. Walsh. 1994. Hyperthermic and hypertonic shock induce HSP70 accumulation and thermotolerance but not osmotic tolerance in cultured mammalian renal cells. The Physiologist, 37: A98.
Yin, M., H. R. Palmer, J. J. Bedford, A. Fyfe-Johnson, F. Santoso, J. Suko, and P. H. Yancey. 1999. Unusual osmolytes in deep-sea vestimentiferans, gastropods, and echinoderms. Amer. Zool, 39:65A.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||